From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@kernel.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on
	aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org
Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18])
	by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30DD9C19F2B
	for <linux-kernel@archiver.kernel.org>; Thu,  4 Aug 2022 09:00:53 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S237572AbiHDJAv (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@archiver.kernel.org>);
        Thu, 4 Aug 2022 05:00:51 -0400
Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:60710 "EHLO
        lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S233653AbiHDJAt (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Thu, 4 Aug 2022 05:00:49 -0400
Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org (dfw.source.kernel.org [139.178.84.217])
        by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9D9FACE24
        for <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>; Thu,  4 Aug 2022 02:00:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140])
        (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
        (No client certificate requested)
        by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 389A261503
        for <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>; Thu,  4 Aug 2022 09:00:48 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 68C9AC433D7;
        Thu,  4 Aug 2022 09:00:46 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org;
        s=k20201202; t=1659603647;
        bh=eXMvzUZu95Ah5TbkmgO+GruIO4JfBPp3ZniH6uNDpd0=;
        h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From;
        b=D5wKjSH12jEj/mlQt3SnP7nUTkjzqys+walMZ821HX8I8zR9zvAeCVJ8RS9N26Dqx
         Dqxa0D2ECes/088nEbAJUCz0w3fD2Kq/Mo5YyYTfB9lRrTKWo31clb/9Viz5dP8/sg
         N73sEzyBJMfDD/rd5N0NRXWXVhhcLP1fJQLoPPA3W/QGsh3O6HByna1ERwOe7Gi7Gx
         X0aB9ShcDATEmFzZFocTGMNUbtYdWvt8n0GfVvmtcHXBlLpCtJGHekhcpZZHa9jzTE
         sj/PzOmXoCwvtq5rji40M8n2hpRh9E5o/iqdTMuxVFs99QY3Ln83JaSItjYLorjPCR
         a8Nm5WbNMmQtA==
Date:   Thu, 4 Aug 2022 09:00:43 +0000
From:   Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@kernel.org>
To:     Patryk Duda <pdk@semihalf.com>
Cc:     Benson Leung <bleung@chromium.org>,
        Guenter Roeck <groeck@chromium.org>,
        Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@google.com>,
        chrome-platform@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        upstream@semihalf.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] platform/chrome: cros_ec_proto: Update version on
 GET_NEXT_EVENT failure
Message-ID: <YuuKu4b02siXj/TS@google.com>
References: <20220714160951.9364-1-pdk@semihalf.com>
 <20220802154128.21175-1-pdk@semihalf.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20220802154128.21175-1-pdk@semihalf.com>
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Tue, Aug 02, 2022 at 05:41:28PM +0200, Patryk Duda wrote:
> Fixes: 3300fdd630d4 ("platform/chrome: cros_ec: handle MKBP more events flag")
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 5.10+

Any concerns if removing the Cc tag?  As I think a Fixes tag should be
sufficient.  On a related note, why did you specify for only 5.10+?

> Signed-off-by: Patryk Duda <pdk@semihalf.com>

You should collect the Reviewed-by tags the patch already got as dropping
`ver_mask` initialization isn't a big change.  I could do that for the patch
this time.

[...]
> v0 -> v1
> - Dropped `ver_mask` initialization.

Please start versioning from v1 next time.