From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2699C25B0F for ; Mon, 15 Aug 2022 02:06:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230248AbiHOCGv (ORCPT ); Sun, 14 Aug 2022 22:06:51 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:42888 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230158AbiHOCGt (ORCPT ); Sun, 14 Aug 2022 22:06:49 -0400 Received: from mail-pf1-x42a.google.com (mail-pf1-x42a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::42a]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF00412AAF for ; Sun, 14 Aug 2022 19:06:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pf1-x42a.google.com with SMTP id d20so5628576pfq.5 for ; Sun, 14 Aug 2022 19:06:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chromium.org; s=google; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc; bh=RGx/Qp3Gi5F06shkDIHb1fnw3ffr/xXLSbmYylTjeeA=; b=bDsmXmdfczHc+NbW7ruAgdcczOb/4l8mmhDGampzTGcpRHHjJ1twbK+RQQXZEpO5BH kSCpjVDPFFzEO5kwa01XpURyT8Lt2UZnmvUhizde96Qxuji8dtgp2AcZGrXU4sxqlk4w a63qDx4rW37z+3Jhe6ZiSpBXT/fve8KKjdbXc= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc; bh=RGx/Qp3Gi5F06shkDIHb1fnw3ffr/xXLSbmYylTjeeA=; b=lrbSP6RWtmu9k8oGIStRU/st7Alkw3/3H37H/CG6u+nhQi+YitY2n+zacbZBXgtklo QuZs6qMN35HdUMqhYksmOYCQdbqGvZYDhOzD3g5Dx2TJuH0zCPv4lbFpB4luYr1YEoNr e3ljwCuVNcpC4K0jMp3jRU00Qtl+/FCwjDaBwdB9FH4Tw8ExzxjMeZpE61Oi9NFbuy5f eauTasF5nBw+YUCqHEKNLYionTCoICpebkEIx34pPDgRqggauvy2EVwboX1qrwRj6cmN F7KF2tjpPHxiBbDokIuWLUtaR7FuoSONupeqcylq9rHYmemz60rEyiUyPZi7zCwJJVmO ThEg== X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo2FlOGFXv5Zv759sqeL3w8g1l8GN1pZvcIJ6rSof9qo+Rfr3Ra/ HSOe1k0siufotlrGzM/j5rNhEQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR5YN9YetwZ39QriWr6eUGMiuxJCX6xwv/jOIwrsCt7wxyH3k1QxxlsBGDmrV0fkUVzWNKDs1w== X-Received: by 2002:aa7:95a8:0:b0:52d:4185:198d with SMTP id a8-20020aa795a8000000b0052d4185198dmr14565441pfk.65.1660529207408; Sun, 14 Aug 2022 19:06:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from google.com ([240f:75:7537:3187:110b:946c:84b2:7c95]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d7-20020a170903230700b0016efc27ca98sm6025252plh.169.2022.08.14.19.06.41 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sun, 14 Aug 2022 19:06:46 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2022 11:06:39 +0900 From: Sergey Senozhatsky To: Greg KH Cc: Laurent Pinchart , Paul Menzel , Wang Yating , Christoph Jechlitschek , Hao Yao , Andy Yeh , Sakari Ailus , Bingbu Cao , Tianshu Qiu , linux-media@vger.kernel.org, Mark Pearson , Dell.Client.Kernel@dell.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Guenter Roeck , Sergey Senozhatsky , Andy Whitcroft , Kai-Heng Feng , Christian Schaller , Wouter Bolsterlee , Miguel Palhas , it+linux-media@molgen.mpg.de Subject: Re: Missing MIPI IPU6 camera driver for Intel Alder Lake laptops Message-ID: References: <52c87d91-422d-fca0-4dd5-bbaa559c81b6@molgen.mpg.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On (22/08/11 17:30), Greg KH wrote: > On Thu, Aug 11, 2022 at 06:08:55PM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 11, 2022 at 05:02:40PM +0200, Greg KH wrote: > > > On Thu, Aug 11, 2022 at 04:54:53PM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > > > For the time being, I agree with your recommendation to not buy these > > > > devices if you care about camera support. > > > > > > I second this, don't buy these devices if the vendor is not willing to > > > get their drivers upstreamed properly. > > > > "Not willing" may be a bit too harsh here. I wouldn't just blame Intel > > for not upstreaming a driver if it turns out that the V4L2 API isn't a > > good match and we have no proposal to provide an alternative. > > Did they propose an alternative? From what I saw here they didn't even > attempt it, or did I miss that? The plan here is to land CAM kernel API first and then switch IPU (driver and user-space) to it so that upstreaming for Intel will be easier.