linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, x86@kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 02/10] x86/mtrr: remove unused cyrix_set_all() function
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2022 13:42:16 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YwdgGFJWTV1YF3n2@zn.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aff049cb-ebdd-68ad-5597-d22f87026297@suse.com>

On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 12:41:05PM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
> Maybe the alternative reasoning is much faster to understand: if the
> Cyrix set_all() could be called, the AMD and Centaur ones would be callable,
> too.

Right.

> Those being called would result in a NULL deref, so why should we keep
> the Cyrix one?

I know you're eager to remove dead code - I'd love that too. But before
we do that, we need to find out whether some Cyrix hw out there would
not need this.

I know, I know, they should've complained by now ... maybe they have but
we haven't heard about it.

What it most likely looks like is that those machines - a commit from
before git

commit 8fbdcb188e31ac901e216b466b97e90e8b057daa
Author: Dave Jones <davej@suse.de>
Date:   Wed Aug 14 21:14:22 2002 -0700

    [PATCH] Modular x86 MTRR driver.

talks about

+/*
+ * On Cyrix 6x86(MX) and M II the ARR3 is special: it has connection
+ * with the SMM (System Management Mode) mode. So we need the following:
+ * Check whether SMI_LOCK (CCR3 bit 0) is set
+ *   if it is set, write a warning message: ARR3 cannot be changed!
+ *     (it cannot be changed until the next processor reset)

which sounds like old rust. And which no one uses or such machines are
long dead already.

Wikipedia says:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyrix_6x86

"The Cyrix 6x86 is a line of sixth-generation, 32-bit x86
microprocessors designed and released by Cyrix in 1995..."

So I'm thinking removing it would be ok...

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette

  reply	other threads:[~2022-08-25 11:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-08-20  9:25 [PATCH v2 00/10] x86: make pat and mtrr independent from each other Juergen Gross
2022-08-20  9:25 ` [PATCH v2 01/10] x86/mtrr: fix MTRR fixup on APs Juergen Gross
2022-08-20 10:28   ` Greg KH
2022-08-21 12:25   ` Borislav Petkov
2022-08-21 21:41     ` Borislav Petkov
2022-08-22  5:17       ` Juergen Gross
2022-08-22  8:28         ` Borislav Petkov
2022-08-22  8:32           ` Juergen Gross
2022-10-19 18:45   ` [tip: x86/cpu] x86/mtrr: Add comment for set_mtrr_state() serialization tip-bot2 for Juergen Gross
2022-08-20  9:25 ` [PATCH v2 02/10] x86/mtrr: remove unused cyrix_set_all() function Juergen Gross
2022-08-25 10:31   ` Borislav Petkov
2022-08-25 10:38     ` Juergen Gross
2022-08-25 10:41     ` Juergen Gross
2022-08-25 11:42       ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2022-08-25 12:13         ` Juergen Gross
2022-08-20  9:25 ` [PATCH v2 03/10] x86/mtrr: replace use_intel() with a local flag Juergen Gross
2022-08-20  9:25 ` [PATCH v2 04/10] x86: move some code out of arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mtrr Juergen Gross
2022-08-20  9:25 ` [PATCH v2 05/10] x86/mtrr: split generic_set_all() Juergen Gross
2022-08-20  9:25 ` [PATCH v2 06/10] x86/mtrr: remove set_all callback from struct mtrr_ops Juergen Gross
2022-08-20  9:25 ` [PATCH v2 07/10] x86/mtrr: simplify mtrr_bp_init() Juergen Gross
2022-08-20  9:25 ` [PATCH v2 08/10] x86/mtrr: let cache_aps_delayed_init replace mtrr_aps_delayed_init Juergen Gross
2022-08-20  9:25 ` [PATCH v2 09/10] x86/mtrr: add a stop_machine() handler calling only cache_cpu_init() Juergen Gross
2022-08-20  9:25 ` [PATCH v2 10/10] x86: decouple pat and mtrr handling Juergen Gross

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YwdgGFJWTV1YF3n2@zn.tnic \
    --to=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jgross@suse.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).