From: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
To: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Daire Byrne <daire@dneg.com>,
Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>,
Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>,
Linux NFS Mailing List <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/10] VFS: move want_write checks into lookup_hash_update()
Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2022 04:48:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YwmUC7UNvNFdLTlc@ZenIV> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <166147984374.25420.3477094952897986387.stgit@noble.brown>
On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 12:10:43PM +1000, NeilBrown wrote:
> mnt_want_write() is always called before lookup_hash_update(), so
> we can simplify the code by moving the call into that function.
>
> If lookup_hash_update() succeeds, it now will have claimed the
> want_write lock. If it fails, the want_write lock isn't held.
>
> To allow this, lookup_hash_update() now receives a 'struct path *'
> instead of 'struct dentry *'
>
> Note that when creating a name, any error from mnt_want_write() does not
> get reported unless there is no other error. For unlink/rmdir though,
> an error from mnt_want_write() is immediately fatal - overriding ENOENT
> for example. This behaviour seems strange, but this patch is careful to
> preserve it.
Would be a nice idea, if not for the mess with LOOKUP_SILLY_RENAME later
in the series...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-27 3:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-26 2:10 [PATCH/RFC 00/10 v5] Improve scalability of directory operations NeilBrown
2022-08-26 2:10 ` [PATCH 09/10] VFS: add LOOKUP_SILLY_RENAME NeilBrown
2022-08-27 1:21 ` Al Viro
2022-08-29 3:15 ` NeilBrown
2022-08-26 2:10 ` [PATCH 01/10] VFS: support parallel updates in the one directory NeilBrown
2022-08-26 19:06 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-08-26 23:06 ` NeilBrown
2022-08-27 0:13 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-08-27 0:23 ` Al Viro
2022-08-27 21:14 ` Al Viro
2022-08-27 0:17 ` Al Viro
2022-09-01 0:31 ` NeilBrown
2022-09-01 3:44 ` Al Viro
2022-08-27 3:43 ` Al Viro
2022-08-29 1:59 ` NeilBrown
2022-09-03 0:06 ` Al Viro
2022-09-03 1:40 ` NeilBrown
2022-09-03 2:12 ` Al Viro
2022-09-03 17:52 ` Al Viro
2022-09-04 23:33 ` NeilBrown
2022-08-26 2:10 ` [PATCH 08/10] NFSD: allow parallel creates from nfsd NeilBrown
2022-08-27 4:37 ` Al Viro
2022-08-29 3:12 ` NeilBrown
2022-08-26 2:10 ` [PATCH 05/10] VFS: export done_path_update() NeilBrown
2022-08-26 2:10 ` [PATCH 02/10] VFS: move EEXIST and ENOENT tests into lookup_hash_update() NeilBrown
2022-08-26 2:10 ` [PATCH 06/10] VFS: support concurrent renames NeilBrown
2022-08-27 4:12 ` Al Viro
2022-08-29 3:08 ` NeilBrown
2022-08-26 2:10 ` [PATCH 10/10] NFS: support parallel updates in the one directory NeilBrown
2022-08-26 15:31 ` John Stoffel
2022-08-26 23:13 ` NeilBrown
2022-08-26 2:10 ` [PATCH 03/10] VFS: move want_write checks into lookup_hash_update() NeilBrown
2022-08-27 3:48 ` Al Viro [this message]
2022-08-26 2:10 ` [PATCH 04/10] VFS: move dput() and mnt_drop_write() into done_path_update() NeilBrown
2022-08-26 2:10 ` [PATCH 07/10] VFS: hold DCACHE_PAR_UPDATE lock across d_revalidate() NeilBrown
2022-08-26 14:42 ` [PATCH/RFC 00/10 v5] Improve scalability of directory operations John Stoffel
2022-08-26 23:30 ` NeilBrown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YwmUC7UNvNFdLTlc@ZenIV \
--to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=daire@dneg.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).