From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
To: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huaweicloud.com>
Cc: ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org,
martin.lau@linux.dev, song@kernel.org, yhs@fb.com,
john.fastabend@gmail.com, kpsingh@kernel.org, sdf@google.com,
haoluo@google.com, jolsa@kernel.org, mykolal@fb.com,
corbet@lwn.net, dhowells@redhat.com, rostedt@goodmis.org,
mingo@redhat.com, paul@paul-moore.com, jmorris@namei.org,
serge@hallyn.com, shuah@kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, keyrings@vger.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
deso@posteo.net, Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 04/10] KEYS: Move KEY_LOOKUP_ to include/linux/key.h
Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2022 06:57:41 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YwrntbSJUs2cA7Xn@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <acae432697e854748d9a44c732ec8cab807d9d46.camel@huaweicloud.com>
On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 09:14:09AM +0200, Roberto Sassu wrote:
> On Fri, 2022-08-26 at 08:42 +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 05:29:23PM +0200,
> > roberto.sassu@huaweicloud.com wrote:
> > > From: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huawei.com>
> > >
> > > In preparation for the patch that introduces the
> > > bpf_lookup_user_key() eBPF
> > > kfunc, move KEY_LOOKUP_ definitions to include/linux/key.h, to be
> > > able to
> > > validate the kfunc parameters.
> > >
> > > Also, introduce key_lookup_flags_check() directly in
> > > include/linux/key.h,
> > > to reduce the risk that the check is not in sync with currently
> > > defined
> > > flags.
> >
> > Missing the description what the heck this function even is.
> >
> > Please, explain that.
>
> Hi Jarkko
>
> sorry, forgot to update the commit description. Will do it.
>
> > Also, the short subject is misleading because this *just*
> > does not move flags.
> >
> > > Signed-off-by: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huawei.com>
> > > Reviewed-by: KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>
> > > ---
> > > include/linux/key.h | 11 +++++++++++
> > > security/keys/internal.h | 2 --
> > > 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/include/linux/key.h b/include/linux/key.h
> > > index 7febc4881363..b5bbae77a9e7 100644
> > > --- a/include/linux/key.h
> > > +++ b/include/linux/key.h
> > > @@ -88,6 +88,17 @@ enum key_need_perm {
> > > KEY_DEFER_PERM_CHECK, /* Special: permission check is
> > > deferred */
> > > };
> > >
> > > +#define KEY_LOOKUP_CREATE 0x01
> > > +#define KEY_LOOKUP_PARTIAL 0x02
> > > +
> >
> > /*
> > * Explain what the heck this function is.
> > */
> > > +static inline int key_lookup_flags_check(u64 flags)
> > > +{
> > > + if (flags & ~(KEY_LOOKUP_CREATE | KEY_LOOKUP_PARTIAL))
> > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > +
> > > + return 0;
> > > +}
> >
> > This is essentially a boolean function, right?
> >
> > I.e. the implementation can be just:
> >
> > !!(flags & ~(KEY_LOOKUP_CREATE | KEY_LOOKUP_PARTIAL))
>
> Absolutely fine with that, if you prefer.
It can be either, it more depends on if a new function
is needed in the first place.
E.g. if you are worried about maintaining you could just
as well define a constant containing the mask, right?
>
> > Not even sure if this is needed in the first place, or
> > would it be better just to open code it. How many call
> > sites does it have anyway?
> >
>
> Daniel preferred to have this check here.
How many call sites?
BR, Jarkko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-28 3:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-18 15:29 [PATCH v12 00/10] bpf: Add kfuncs for PKCS#7 signature verification roberto.sassu
2022-08-18 15:29 ` [PATCH v12 01/10] bpf: Allow kfuncs to be used in LSM programs roberto.sassu
2022-08-18 15:29 ` [PATCH v12 02/10] btf: Handle dynamic pointer parameter in kfuncs roberto.sassu
2022-08-26 4:54 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-08-26 5:16 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-08-26 5:46 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-08-26 14:43 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-08-26 14:46 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-08-26 15:34 ` Roberto Sassu
2022-08-26 16:32 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-08-26 16:41 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-08-26 19:10 ` Roberto Sassu
2022-08-18 15:29 ` [PATCH v12 03/10] bpf: Export bpf_dynptr_get_size() roberto.sassu
2022-08-18 15:29 ` [PATCH v12 04/10] KEYS: Move KEY_LOOKUP_ to include/linux/key.h roberto.sassu
2022-08-26 5:42 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-08-26 7:14 ` Roberto Sassu
2022-08-26 9:12 ` [PATCH v14 04/10] KEYS: Move KEY_LOOKUP_ to include/linux/key.h and add flags check function Roberto Sassu
2022-08-26 9:22 ` Roberto Sassu
2022-08-28 3:59 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-08-28 4:03 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-08-29 7:25 ` Roberto Sassu
2022-08-29 12:33 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-08-28 3:57 ` Jarkko Sakkinen [this message]
2022-08-28 12:04 ` [PATCH v12 04/10] KEYS: Move KEY_LOOKUP_ to include/linux/key.h KP Singh
2022-08-18 15:29 ` [PATCH v12 05/10] bpf: Add bpf_lookup_*_key() and bpf_key_put() kfuncs roberto.sassu
2022-08-18 15:29 ` [PATCH v12 06/10] bpf: Add bpf_verify_pkcs7_signature() kfunc roberto.sassu
2022-08-18 15:29 ` [PATCH v12 07/10] selftests/bpf: Compile kernel with everything as built-in roberto.sassu
2022-08-18 17:35 ` Daniel Müller
2022-08-18 15:29 ` [PATCH v12 08/10] selftests/bpf: Add verifier tests for bpf_lookup_*_key() and bpf_key_put() roberto.sassu
2022-08-18 15:29 ` [PATCH v12 09/10] selftests/bpf: Add additional tests for bpf_lookup_*_key() roberto.sassu
2022-08-18 15:29 ` [PATCH v12 10/10] selftests/bpf: Add test for bpf_verify_pkcs7_signature() kfunc roberto.sassu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YwrntbSJUs2cA7Xn@kernel.org \
--to=jarkko@kernel.org \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=deso@posteo.net \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=keyrings@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mykolal@fb.com \
--cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
--cc=roberto.sassu@huawei.com \
--cc=roberto.sassu@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sdf@google.com \
--cc=serge@hallyn.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=yhs@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).