From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9FBEECAAA1 for ; Tue, 6 Sep 2022 21:40:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229886AbiIFVkW (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Sep 2022 17:40:22 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:36368 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229546AbiIFVkU (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Sep 2022 17:40:20 -0400 Received: from mail-pg1-x536.google.com (mail-pg1-x536.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::536]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C85127B2C; Tue, 6 Sep 2022 14:40:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pg1-x536.google.com with SMTP id bh13so11794471pgb.4; Tue, 06 Sep 2022 14:40:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to :cc:subject:date; bh=KRNnNW5gop8MgB96pBKivy08fdE2kbwt/8Fs47522vs=; b=hTESb0DrBoIe3vVqHk+Qi+WRzS9jGZRFdl1dVXMEI8ergblTBCFY9Gx9Ccj5YgRhh/ +RpF/2QnwVaoTJDsO4ch7k0epWUEwNcgP17FSbncVCMHkpw7mOFtJygJkGmQMYfyPNDf MknLLZi+ut2xe0wjgxO9lOgw6KHChgUXPGn2OzBr7IWa7bkwXP9gYrs9eVZI1KJEODeT JoYAjgKNxOIHhnN1kJ4FXHKtr6HG6oOi65Un4tYBDwZ6zMNWE9d3sQykpNttuqoGDe8e IEQLs2qhY66WkQEJU1X6IfI8Bm5V0kMpxt0C37bkSiAl/ZwWQ9hlUsyYebTtgKgCWR1G q5oA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=KRNnNW5gop8MgB96pBKivy08fdE2kbwt/8Fs47522vs=; b=OiRKH6xXE9nV05JyY7Moo/KRom6dAz1+jIfCn5zZjZMIvGCldvmoKPpVecJxHyPq1Q YJeMmjC1Qv3ALDx7LcqBaNFoiWwAkTrGZSDIrHVSvHzfB2aiYlheld/aGqNhA3ClNLbS /FnA67KT3XEo5EiHKfFOA9OaO820wXz/rkUePasjwvI5/iMoSdWY6juK8TRXn8LrIq/L Ha2et7hZRqVmteStsEU07T9ndyKqqoLd2aCFDRinyMM93xbzOPmgtPEtydS+V6DgzZhv 2kQMDtdldJn6LGKgtLsVr+tlUjp66wIyjLfoa+4tnS2TM38rUYfSpF3pQKKgmKVf6yil Y9/g== X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo19iuXgAJXMqY+OpkzHv8MyNIEpnCvXJrqcu3cKAFQ8n/2RzmFG v8E+v+SnM8qXQVFQnSf/YaM= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR6HctpHojcywer9BiWD/Q7J0VF5O8UBtoJMVR4KzCb5EF934R3kjDC+D/uCU4H46Hy8I8Anww== X-Received: by 2002:a63:d607:0:b0:427:bc0c:55c8 with SMTP id q7-20020a63d607000000b00427bc0c55c8mr578538pgg.402.1662500418958; Tue, 06 Sep 2022 14:40:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from google.com ([2620:15c:202:201:abc4:5d24:5a73:a96b]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k88-20020a17090a14e100b00200a5e50094sm1848653pja.48.2022.09.06.14.40.17 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 06 Sep 2022 14:40:18 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2022 14:40:15 -0700 From: Dmitry Torokhov To: Pali =?iso-8859-1?Q?Roh=E1r?= Cc: Shawn Guo , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Thomas Petazzoni , Bjorn Helgaas , Rob Herring , Krzysztof =?utf-8?Q?Wilczy=C5=84ski?= , Linus Walleij , Bartosz Golaszewski , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] PCI: mvebu: switch to using gpiod API Message-ID: References: <20220906204301.3736813-1-dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> <20220906204301.3736813-2-dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> <20220906211628.6u4hbpn4shjcvqel@pali> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Sep 06, 2022 at 02:26:32PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > Hi Pali, > > On Tue, Sep 06, 2022 at 11:16:28PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote: > > Hello! > > > > On Tuesday 06 September 2022 13:43:01 Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > > This patch switches the driver away from legacy gpio/of_gpio API to > > > gpiod API, and removes use of of_get_named_gpio_flags() which I want to > > > make private to gpiolib. > > > > There are many pending pci-mvebu.c patches waiting for review and merge, > > so I would suggest to wait until all other mvebu patches are processed > > and then process this one... longer waiting period :-( > > OK, it is not super urgent. OTOH it is a very simple patch :) By the way, do the pending patches address soft-leaking of reset GPIO when the driver fails to acquire clock for a port (I called it soft-leaking since devm will free it on unbind)? Thanks. -- Dmitry