From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Shiyang Ruan <ruansy.fnst@fujitsu.com>
Cc: dan.j.williams@intel.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, nvdimm@lists.linux.dev,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
hch@infradead.org, david@fromorbit.com, jane.chu@oracle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 0/3] mm, pmem, xfs: Introduce MF_MEM_REMOVE for unbind
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2022 08:43:33 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YySZpaX6NU6aSdke@magnolia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d3b5ce9e-dcdf-26b1-cdea-712d7e1be1f6@fujitsu.com>
On Thu, Sep 15, 2022 at 10:56:09AM +0800, Shiyang Ruan wrote:
>
>
> 在 2022/9/15 2:15, Darrick J. Wong 写道:
> > On Wed, Sep 14, 2022 at 11:09:23AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > > On Wed, Sep 07, 2022 at 05:46:00PM +0800, Shiyang Ruan wrote:
> > > > ping
> > > >
> > > > 在 2022/9/2 18:35, Shiyang Ruan 写道:
> > > > > Changes since v7:
> > > > > 1. Add P1 to fix calculation mistake
> > > > > 2. Add P2 to move drop_pagecache_sb() to super.c for xfs to use
> > > > > 3. P3: Add invalidate all mappings after sync.
> > > > > 4. P3: Set offset&len to be start&length of device when it is to be removed.
> > > > > 5. Rebase on 6.0-rc3 + Darrick's patch[1] + Dan's patch[2].
> > > > >
> > > > > Changes since v6:
> > > > > 1. Rebase on 6.0-rc2 and Darrick's patch[1].
> > > > >
> > > > > [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-xfs/Yv5wIa2crHioYeRr@magnolia/
> > > > > [2]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-xfs/166153426798.2758201.15108211981034512993.stgit@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com/
> > >
> > > Just out of curiosity, is it your (or djbw's) intent to send all these
> > > as bugfixes for 6.0 via akpm like all the other dax fixen?
> >
> > Aha, this is 6.1 stuff, please ignore this question.
>
> Actually I hope these patches can be merged ASAP. (But it seems a bit late
> for 6.0 now.)
>
> And do you know which/whose branch has picked up your patch[1]? I cannot
> find it.
It's not upstream, though the maintainer (Dave currently) reviewed it.
I don't know if he hasn't had time to put together a fixes branch or if
he's simply punting all the queued up stuff to 6.1.
(Dave?)
--D
>
> --
> Thanks,
> Ruan.
>
> >
> > --D
> >
> > > --D
> > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Shiyang Ruan (3):
> > > > > xfs: fix the calculation of length and end
> > > > > fs: move drop_pagecache_sb() for others to use
> > > > > mm, pmem, xfs: Introduce MF_MEM_REMOVE for unbind
> > > > >
> > > > > drivers/dax/super.c | 3 ++-
> > > > > fs/drop_caches.c | 33 ---------------------------------
> > > > > fs/super.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > > > fs/xfs/xfs_notify_failure.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> > > > > include/linux/fs.h | 1 +
> > > > > include/linux/mm.h | 1 +
> > > > > 6 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
> > > > >
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-16 15:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-26 13:03 [PATCH v7] mm, pmem, xfs: Introduce MF_MEM_REMOVE for unbind Shiyang Ruan
2022-08-26 21:35 ` Dan Williams
2022-08-29 10:02 ` Shiyang Ruan
2022-08-29 14:49 ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-09-02 10:35 ` [PATCH v8 0/3] " Shiyang Ruan
2022-09-02 10:35 ` [PATCH 1/3] xfs: fix the calculation of length and end Shiyang Ruan
2022-09-14 18:13 ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-09-02 10:36 ` [PATCH 2/3] fs: move drop_pagecache_sb() for others to use Shiyang Ruan
2022-09-14 18:16 ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-09-02 10:36 ` [PATCH 3/3] mm, pmem, xfs: Introduce MF_MEM_REMOVE for unbind Shiyang Ruan
2022-09-14 18:15 ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-09-15 1:49 ` Shiyang Ruan
2022-09-20 2:45 ` Dave Chinner
2022-09-21 0:58 ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-09-07 9:46 ` [PATCH v8 0/3] " Shiyang Ruan
2022-09-14 18:09 ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-09-14 18:15 ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-09-15 2:56 ` Shiyang Ruan
2022-09-16 15:43 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YySZpaX6NU6aSdke@magnolia \
--to=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jane.chu@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nvdimm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=ruansy.fnst@fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).