linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Cc: rcu@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	rushikesh.s.kadam@intel.com, urezki@gmail.com,
	neeraj.iitr10@gmail.com, paulmck@kernel.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
	vineeth@bitbyteword.org, boqun.feng@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 06/18] rcu: Introduce call_rcu_lazy() API implementation
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2022 23:52:45 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YyujzQ/sU/aAdx4r@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220907094014.GA193994@lothringen>

On Wed, Sep 07, 2022 at 11:40:14AM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 07, 2022 at 12:06:26AM +0000, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> > > > @@ -326,13 +372,20 @@ static bool rcu_nocb_do_flush_bypass(struct rcu_data *rdp, struct rcu_head *rhp,
> > > >   * Note that this function always returns true if rhp is NULL.
> > > >   */
> > > >  static bool rcu_nocb_flush_bypass(struct rcu_data *rdp, struct rcu_head *rhp,
> > > > -				  unsigned long j)
> > > > +				  unsigned long j, unsigned long flush_flags)
> > > >  {
> > > > +	bool ret;
> > > > +
> > > >  	if (!rcu_rdp_is_offloaded(rdp))
> > > >  		return true;
> > > >  	rcu_lockdep_assert_cblist_protected(rdp);
> > > >  	rcu_nocb_bypass_lock(rdp);
> > > > -	return rcu_nocb_do_flush_bypass(rdp, rhp, j);
> > > > +	ret = rcu_nocb_do_flush_bypass(rdp, rhp, j, flush_flags);
> > > > +
> > > > +	if (flush_flags & FLUSH_BP_WAKE)
> > > > +		wake_nocb_gp(rdp, true);
> > > 
> > > Why the true above?
> > > 
> > > Also should we check if the wake up is really necessary (otherwise it means we
> > > force a wake up for all rdp's from rcu_barrier())?
> > > 
> > >        was_alldone = rcu_segcblist_pend_cbs(&rdp->cblist);
> > >        ret = rcu_nocb_do_flush_bypass(rdp, rhp, j, flush_flags);
> > >        if (was_alldone && rcu_segcblist_pend_cbs(&rdp->cblist))
> > >        	  wake_nocb_gp(rdp, false);
> > 
> > You mean something like the following right? Though I'm thinking if its
> > better to call wake_nocb_gp() from tree.c in entrain() and let that handle
> > the wake. That way, we can get rid of the extra FLUSH_BP flags as well and
> > let the flush callers deal with the wakeups..
> 
> Ah yes that could make sense if only one caller cares.
> 
> > 
> > Anyway, for testing this should be good...
> > 
> > ---8<-----------------------
> > 
> > diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h
> > index bd8f39ee2cd0..e3344c262672 100644
> > --- a/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h
> > +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h
> > @@ -382,15 +382,19 @@ static bool rcu_nocb_flush_bypass(struct rcu_data *rdp, struct rcu_head *rhp,
> >  				  unsigned long j, unsigned long flush_flags)
> >  {
> >  	bool ret;
> > +	bool was_alldone;
> >  
> >  	if (!rcu_rdp_is_offloaded(rdp))
> >  		return true;
> >  	rcu_lockdep_assert_cblist_protected(rdp);
> >  	rcu_nocb_bypass_lock(rdp);
> > +	if (flush_flags & FLUSH_BP_WAKE)
> > +		was_alldone = !rcu_segcblist_pend_cbs(&rdp->cblist);
> > +
> 
> You can check that outside bypass lock (but you still need nocb_lock).
> 
> >  	ret = rcu_nocb_do_flush_bypass(rdp, rhp, j, flush_flags);
> >  
> > -	if (flush_flags & FLUSH_BP_WAKE)
> > -		wake_nocb_gp(rdp, true);
> > +	if (flush_flags & FLUSH_BP_WAKE && was_alldone)
> > +		wake_nocb_gp(rdp, false);
> 
> That doesn't check if the bypass list was empty.

I am ending up with something like the below for v6, after discussing with
Paul on IRC he pointed out we only need to do the rcu_barrier() related
wakeup when all the CBs are lazy in the bypass list. Otherwise timer goes
off. I think Frederic mentioned something similar above in different words.

I prefer to keep this logic in tree_nocb.h since rcu_barrier_entrain()
shouldn't have to deal with nocb internals (in theory anyway).

Looks Ok?

thanks,

 - Joel

---8<-----------------------

From: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Subject: [PATCH for v6] fixup! rcu: Introduce call_rcu_lazy() API implementation

Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
---
 kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h | 14 +++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h
index c197534d0c99..fd056358f041 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h
@@ -375,18 +375,26 @@ static bool rcu_nocb_flush_bypass(struct rcu_data *rdp, struct rcu_head *rhp,
 				  unsigned long j, unsigned long flush_flags)
 {
 	bool ret;
-	bool was_alldone;
+	bool was_alldone = false;
+	bool bypass_all_lazy = false;
 
 	if (!rcu_rdp_is_offloaded(rdp))
 		return true;
 	rcu_lockdep_assert_cblist_protected(rdp);
 	rcu_nocb_bypass_lock(rdp);
-	if (flush_flags & FLUSH_BP_WAKE)
+
+	if (flush_flags & FLUSH_BP_WAKE) {
 		was_alldone = !rcu_segcblist_pend_cbs(&rdp->cblist);
+		bypass_all_lazy =
+		  (rcu_cblist_n_cbs(&rdp->nocb_bypass) == rdp->lazy_len);
+	}
 
 	ret = rcu_nocb_do_flush_bypass(rdp, rhp, j, flush_flags);
 
-	if (flush_flags & FLUSH_BP_WAKE && was_alldone)
+	// Wake up the nocb GP thread if needed. GP thread could be sleeping
+	// while waiting for lazy timer to expire (otherwise rcu_barrier may
+	// end up waiting for the duration of the lazy timer).
+	if (flush_flags & FLUSH_BP_WAKE && was_alldone && bypass_all_lazy)
 		wake_nocb_gp(rdp, false);
 
 	return ret;
-- 
2.37.3.998.g577e59143f-goog


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-09-21 23:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 73+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-09-01 22:17 [PATCH v5 00/18] Implement call_rcu_lazy() and miscellaneous fixes Joel Fernandes (Google)
2022-09-01 22:17 ` [PATCH v5 01/18] mm/slub: perform free consistency checks before call_rcu Joel Fernandes (Google)
2022-09-01 22:17 ` [PATCH v5 02/18] mm/sl[au]b: rearrange struct slab fields to allow larger rcu_head Joel Fernandes (Google)
2022-09-02  9:26   ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-09-02  9:30     ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-09-02 15:09       ` Joel Fernandes
2022-09-03 13:53         ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-09-01 22:17 ` [PATCH v5 03/18] rcu/tree: Use READ_ONCE() for lockless read of rnp->qsmask Joel Fernandes (Google)
2022-09-06 22:26   ` Boqun Feng
2022-09-06 22:31     ` Joel Fernandes
2022-09-01 22:17 ` [PATCH v5 04/18] rcu: Fix late wakeup when flush of bypass cblist happens Joel Fernandes (Google)
2022-09-02 11:35   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2022-09-02 23:58     ` Joel Fernandes
2022-09-03 15:10       ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-09-04 21:13       ` Frederic Weisbecker
2022-09-03 14:04   ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-09-03 14:05     ` Joel Fernandes
2022-09-06  3:07   ` Joel Fernandes
2022-09-06  9:48     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2022-09-07  2:43       ` Joel Fernandes
2022-09-01 22:17 ` [PATCH v5 05/18] rcu: Move trace_rcu_callback() before bypassing Joel Fernandes (Google)
2022-09-01 22:17 ` [PATCH v5 06/18] rcu: Introduce call_rcu_lazy() API implementation Joel Fernandes (Google)
2022-09-02 15:21   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2022-09-02 23:09     ` Joel Fernandes
2022-09-05 12:59       ` Frederic Weisbecker
2022-09-05 20:18         ` Joel Fernandes
2022-09-05 20:32         ` Joel Fernandes
2022-09-06  8:55           ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-09-06 16:16             ` Joel Fernandes
2022-09-06 17:05               ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-09-03 22:00     ` Joel Fernandes
2022-09-04 21:01       ` Frederic Weisbecker
2022-09-05 20:20         ` Joel Fernandes
2022-09-06  3:05     ` Joel Fernandes
2022-09-06 15:17       ` Frederic Weisbecker
2022-09-06 16:15         ` Joel Fernandes
2022-09-06 16:31           ` Joel Fernandes
2022-09-06 16:38             ` Joel Fernandes
2022-09-06 16:43               ` Joel Fernandes
2022-09-06 19:11                 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2022-09-07  2:56                   ` Joel Fernandes
2022-09-07  9:56                     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2022-09-07 10:03           ` Frederic Weisbecker
2022-09-07 14:01             ` Joel Fernandes
2022-09-07  0:06         ` Joel Fernandes
2022-09-07  9:40           ` Frederic Weisbecker
2022-09-07 13:44             ` Joel Fernandes
2022-09-07 15:38               ` Frederic Weisbecker
2022-09-07 15:39                 ` Joel Fernandes
2022-09-21 23:52             ` Joel Fernandes [this message]
2022-09-06 18:16       ` Uladzislau Rezki
2022-09-06 18:21         ` Joel Fernandes
2022-09-07  8:52           ` Uladzislau Rezki
2022-09-07 15:23             ` Joel Fernandes
2022-09-03 14:03   ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-09-03 14:05     ` Joel Fernandes
2022-09-01 22:17 ` [PATCH v5 07/18] rcu: shrinker for lazy rcu Joel Fernandes (Google)
2022-09-01 22:17 ` [PATCH v5 08/18] rcu: Add per-CB tracing for queuing, flush and invocation Joel Fernandes (Google)
2022-09-02 16:48   ` kernel test robot
2022-09-03 12:39     ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-09-03 14:07       ` Joel Fernandes
2022-09-02 19:01   ` kernel test robot
2022-09-01 22:17 ` [PATCH v5 09/18] rcuscale: Add laziness and kfree tests Joel Fernandes (Google)
2022-09-01 22:17 ` [PATCH v5 10/18] rcutorture: Add test code for call_rcu_lazy() Joel Fernandes (Google)
2022-09-01 22:17 ` [PATCH v5 11/18] fs: Move call_rcu() to call_rcu_lazy() in some paths Joel Fernandes (Google)
2022-09-01 22:17 ` [PATCH v5 12/18] cred: Move call_rcu() to call_rcu_lazy() Joel Fernandes (Google)
2022-09-01 22:17 ` [PATCH v5 13/18] security: " Joel Fernandes (Google)
2022-09-01 22:17 ` [PATCH v5 14/18] net/core: " Joel Fernandes (Google)
2022-09-01 22:17 ` [PATCH v5 15/18] kernel: Move various core kernel usages " Joel Fernandes (Google)
2022-09-01 22:17 ` [PATCH v5 16/18] lib: Move call_rcu() " Joel Fernandes (Google)
2022-09-01 22:17 ` [PATCH v5 17/18] i915: " Joel Fernandes (Google)
2022-09-01 22:17 ` [PATCH v5 18/18] fork: Move thread_stack_free_rcu() " Joel Fernandes (Google)
2022-09-03 15:22 ` [PATCH v5 00/18] Implement call_rcu_lazy() and miscellaneous fixes Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YyujzQ/sU/aAdx4r@google.com \
    --to=joel@joelfernandes.org \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=neeraj.iitr10@gmail.com \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=rushikesh.s.kadam@intel.com \
    --cc=urezki@gmail.com \
    --cc=vineeth@bitbyteword.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).