From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29198C6FA99 for ; Sun, 12 Mar 2023 19:45:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230337AbjCLTp3 (ORCPT ); Sun, 12 Mar 2023 15:45:29 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:41936 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229821AbjCLTp1 (ORCPT ); Sun, 12 Mar 2023 15:45:27 -0400 Received: from jabberwock.ucw.cz (jabberwock.ucw.cz [46.255.230.98]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E6C2025949; Sun, 12 Mar 2023 12:45:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: by jabberwock.ucw.cz (Postfix, from userid 1017) id 82C0D1C0AAC; Sun, 12 Mar 2023 20:45:24 +0100 (CET) Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2023 20:45:23 +0100 From: Pavel Machek To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com, srw@sladewatkins.net, rwarsow@gmx.de Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/528] 5.10.173-rc2 review Message-ID: References: <20230311091908.975813595@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="qe/Jjd6815Vh63SM" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230311091908.975813595@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --qe/Jjd6815Vh63SM Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi! > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.173 release. > There are 528 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. CIP testing did not find any problems here: (We tested Linux 5.10.173 (e5f315b55f8e) and 6.1, 4.19 and 4.14 seem ok, too). https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/tree/linux-= 5.10.y Tested-by: Pavel Machek (CIP) Best regards, Pavel --=20 DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany --qe/Jjd6815Vh63SM Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iF0EABECAB0WIQRPfPO7r0eAhk010v0w5/Bqldv68gUCZA4r0wAKCRAw5/Bqldv6 8iTNAKC7+b+W5w6QYC+TEzNeGZ1QJ0t0DACbB7Q3h2YJWvSVKeRTXupGsyjAl6A= =5/u7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --qe/Jjd6815Vh63SM--