From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Cc: Zefan Li <lizefan.x@bytedance.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] cgroup/cpuset: A new "isolcpus" paritition
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2023 10:22:23 -1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZDcS_yVCgh6g1LoM@slm.duckdns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1ce6a073-e573-0c32-c3d8-f67f3d389a28@redhat.com>
Hello, Waiman.
On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 03:52:36PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
> There is still a distribution hierarchy as the list of isolation CPUs have
> to be distributed down to the target cgroup through the hierarchy. For
> example,
>
> cgroup root
> +- isolcpus (cpus 8,9; isolcpus)
> +- user.slice (cpus 1-9; ecpus 1-7; member)
> +- user-x.slice (cpus 8,9; ecpus 8,9; isolated)
> +- user-y.slice (cpus 1,2; ecpus 1,2; member)
>
> OTOH, I do agree that this can be somewhat hacky. That is why I post it as a
> RFC to solicit feedback.
Wouldn't it be possible to make it hierarchical by adding another cpumask to
cpuset which lists the cpus which are allowed in the hierarchy but not used
unless claimed by an isolated domain?
Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-12 20:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-12 15:37 [RFC PATCH 0/5] cgroup/cpuset: A new "isolcpus" paritition Waiman Long
2023-04-12 19:28 ` Tejun Heo
[not found] ` <1ce6a073-e573-0c32-c3d8-f67f3d389a28@redhat.com>
2023-04-12 20:22 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2023-04-12 20:33 ` Waiman Long
2023-04-13 0:03 ` Tejun Heo
2023-04-13 0:26 ` Waiman Long
2023-04-13 0:33 ` Tejun Heo
2023-04-13 0:55 ` Waiman Long
2023-04-13 1:17 ` Tejun Heo
2023-04-13 1:55 ` Waiman Long
2023-04-14 1:22 ` Waiman Long
2023-04-14 16:54 ` Tejun Heo
2023-04-14 17:29 ` Waiman Long
2023-04-14 17:34 ` Tejun Heo
2023-04-14 17:38 ` Waiman Long
2023-04-14 19:06 ` Waiman Long
2023-05-02 18:01 ` Michal Koutný
2023-05-02 21:26 ` Waiman Long
2023-05-02 22:27 ` Michal Koutný
2023-05-04 3:01 ` Waiman Long
2023-05-05 16:03 ` Tejun Heo
2023-05-05 16:25 ` Waiman Long
2023-05-08 1:03 ` Waiman Long
2023-05-22 19:49 ` Tejun Heo
2023-05-28 21:18 ` Waiman Long
2023-06-05 18:03 ` Tejun Heo
2023-06-05 20:00 ` Waiman Long
2023-06-05 20:27 ` Tejun Heo
2023-06-06 2:47 ` Waiman Long
2023-06-06 19:58 ` Tejun Heo
2023-06-06 20:11 ` Waiman Long
2023-06-06 20:13 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZDcS_yVCgh6g1LoM@slm.duckdns.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lizefan.x@bytedance.com \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).