From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
To: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>,
kgdb-bugreport@lists.sourceforge.net,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
mpe@ellerman.id.au, Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@chromium.org>,
Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@linaro.org>,
npiggin@gmail.com, davem@davemloft.net,
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>,
sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
ravi.v.shankar@intel.com, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
Pingfan Liu <kernelfans@gmail.com>,
Guenter Roeck <groeck@chromium.org>,
Lecopzer Chen <lecopzer.chen@mediatek.com>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
ito-yuichi@fujitsu.com, ricardo.neri@intel.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Masayoshi Mizuma <msys.mizuma@gmail.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 12/18] watchdog/hardlockup: Rename some "NMI watchdog" constants/function
Date: Wed, 24 May 2023 15:38:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZG4TW--j-DdSsUO6@alley> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230519101840.v5.12.I91f7277bab4bf8c0cb238732ed92e7ce7bbd71a6@changeid>
On Fri 2023-05-19 10:18:36, Douglas Anderson wrote:
> Do a search and replace of:
> - NMI_WATCHDOG_ENABLED => WATCHDOG_HARDLOCKUP_ENABLED
> - SOFT_WATCHDOG_ENABLED => WATCHDOG_SOFTOCKUP_ENABLED
> - watchdog_nmi_ => watchdog_hardlockup_
> - nmi_watchdog_available => watchdog_hardlockup_available
> - nmi_watchdog_user_enabled => watchdog_hardlockup_user_enabled
> - soft_watchdog_user_enabled => watchdog_softlockup_user_enabled
> - NMI_WATCHDOG_DEFAULT => WATCHDOG_HARDLOCKUP_DEFAULT
>
> Then update a few comments near where names were changed.
>
> This is specifically to make it less confusing when we want to
> introduce the buddy hardlockup detector, which isn't using NMIs. As
> part of this, we sanitized a few names for consistency.
>
> --- a/kernel/watchdog.c
> +++ b/kernel/watchdog.c
> @@ -30,17 +30,17 @@
> static DEFINE_MUTEX(watchdog_mutex);
>
> #if defined(CONFIG_HARDLOCKUP_DETECTOR) || defined(CONFIG_HAVE_NMI_WATCHDOG)
> -# define NMI_WATCHDOG_DEFAULT 1
> +# define WATCHDOG_HARDLOCKUP_DEFAULT 1
> #else
> -# define NMI_WATCHDOG_DEFAULT 0
> +# define WATCHDOG_HARDLOCKUP_DEFAULT 0
> #endif
>
> unsigned long __read_mostly watchdog_enabled;
> int __read_mostly watchdog_user_enabled = 1;
> -int __read_mostly nmi_watchdog_user_enabled = NMI_WATCHDOG_DEFAULT;
> -int __read_mostly soft_watchdog_user_enabled = 1;
> +int __read_mostly watchdog_hardlockup_user_enabled = WATCHDOG_HARDLOCKUP_DEFAULT;
> +int __read_mostly watchdog_softlockup_user_enabled = 1;
I still see nmi_watchdog_user_enabled and soft_watchdog_user_enabled
in include/linux/nmi.h. They are declared there and also mentioned
in a comment.
It seems that they do not actually need to be declared there.
I guess that it was need for the /proc stuff. But it was
moved into kernel/watchdog.c by the commit commit dd0693fdf054f2ed37
("watchdog: move watchdog sysctl interface to watchdog.c").
> int __read_mostly watchdog_thresh = 10;
> -static int __read_mostly nmi_watchdog_available;
> +static int __read_mostly watchdog_hardlockup_available;
>
> struct cpumask watchdog_cpumask __read_mostly;
> unsigned long *watchdog_cpumask_bits = cpumask_bits(&watchdog_cpumask);
Otherwise, I like the changes.
With the following:
diff --git a/include/linux/nmi.h b/include/linux/nmi.h
index 83076bf70ce8..d14fe345eae9 100644
--- a/include/linux/nmi.h
+++ b/include/linux/nmi.h
@@ -17,8 +17,6 @@ void lockup_detector_soft_poweroff(void);
void lockup_detector_cleanup(void);
extern int watchdog_user_enabled;
-extern int nmi_watchdog_user_enabled;
-extern int soft_watchdog_user_enabled;
extern int watchdog_thresh;
extern unsigned long watchdog_enabled;
@@ -68,8 +66,8 @@ static inline void reset_hung_task_detector(void) { }
* 'watchdog_enabled' variable. Each lockup detector has its dedicated bit -
* bit 0 for the hard lockup detector and bit 1 for the soft lockup detector.
*
- * 'watchdog_user_enabled', 'nmi_watchdog_user_enabled' and
- * 'soft_watchdog_user_enabled' are variables that are only used as an
+ * 'watchdog_user_enabled', 'watchdog_hardlockup_user_enabled' and
+ * 'watchdog_softlockup_user_enabled' are variables that are only used as an
* 'interface' between the parameters in /proc/sys/kernel and the internal
* state bits in 'watchdog_enabled'. The 'watchdog_thresh' variable is
* handled differently because its value is not boolean, and the lockup
Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
Even better might be to remove the unused declaration in a separate
patch. I think that more declarations are not needed after moving
the /proc stuff into kernel/watchdog.c.
But it might also be fixed later.
Best Regards,
Petr
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-24 13:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-05-19 17:18 [PATCH v5 00/18] watchdog/hardlockup: Add the buddy hardlockup detector Douglas Anderson
2023-05-19 17:18 ` [PATCH v5 01/18] watchdog/perf: Define dummy watchdog_update_hrtimer_threshold() on correct config Douglas Anderson
2023-05-19 17:18 ` [PATCH v5 02/18] watchdog/perf: More properly prevent false positives with turbo modes Douglas Anderson
2023-05-23 9:35 ` Petr Mladek
2023-05-19 17:18 ` [PATCH v5 03/18] watchdog: remove WATCHDOG_DEFAULT Douglas Anderson
2023-05-19 17:18 ` [PATCH v5 04/18] watchdog/hardlockup: change watchdog_nmi_enable() to void Douglas Anderson
2023-05-19 17:18 ` [PATCH v5 05/18] watchdog/perf: Ensure CPU-bound context when creating hardlockup detector event Douglas Anderson
2023-05-19 17:18 ` [PATCH v5 06/18] watchdog/hardlockup: Add comments to touch_nmi_watchdog() Douglas Anderson
2023-05-23 9:58 ` Petr Mladek
2023-05-19 17:18 ` [PATCH v5 07/18] watchdog/perf: Rename watchdog_hld.c to watchdog_perf.c Douglas Anderson
2023-05-19 17:18 ` [PATCH v5 08/18] watchdog/hardlockup: Move perf hardlockup checking/panic to common watchdog.c Douglas Anderson
2023-05-23 11:45 ` Petr Mladek
2023-05-19 17:18 ` [PATCH v5 09/18] watchdog/hardlockup: Style changes to watchdog_hardlockup_check() / is_hardlockup() Douglas Anderson
2023-05-19 17:18 ` [PATCH v5 10/18] watchdog/hardlockup: Add a "cpu" param to watchdog_hardlockup_check() Douglas Anderson
2023-05-23 16:02 ` Petr Mladek
2023-05-23 16:34 ` Doug Anderson
2023-05-24 11:36 ` Petr Mladek
2023-05-19 17:18 ` [PATCH v5 11/18] watchdog/hardlockup: Move perf hardlockup watchdog petting to watchdog.c Douglas Anderson
2023-05-24 13:07 ` Petr Mladek
2023-05-19 17:18 ` [PATCH v5 12/18] watchdog/hardlockup: Rename some "NMI watchdog" constants/function Douglas Anderson
2023-05-24 13:38 ` Petr Mladek [this message]
2023-05-25 23:33 ` Doug Anderson
2023-05-19 17:18 ` [PATCH v5 13/18] watchdog/hardlockup: Have the perf hardlockup use __weak functions more cleanly Douglas Anderson
2023-05-24 13:59 ` Petr Mladek
2023-05-24 19:38 ` Doug Anderson
2023-05-26 14:44 ` Petr Mladek
2023-05-19 17:18 ` [PATCH v5 14/18] watchdog/hardlockup: detect hard lockups using secondary (buddy) CPUs Douglas Anderson
2023-05-25 16:26 ` Petr Mladek
2023-05-25 20:08 ` Doug Anderson
2023-05-26 12:29 ` Petr Mladek
2023-05-19 17:18 ` [PATCH v5 15/18] watchdog/perf: Add a weak function for an arch to detect if perf can use NMIs Douglas Anderson
2023-05-26 12:36 ` Petr Mladek
2023-06-12 10:33 ` Mark Rutland
2023-06-12 13:55 ` Doug Anderson
2023-06-12 13:59 ` Mark Rutland
2023-05-19 17:18 ` [PATCH v5 16/18] watchdog/perf: Adapt the watchdog_perf interface for async model Douglas Anderson
2023-05-19 17:18 ` [PATCH v5 17/18] arm64: add hw_nmi_get_sample_period for preparation of lockup detector Douglas Anderson
2023-05-19 17:18 ` [PATCH v5 18/18] arm64: Enable perf events based hard " Douglas Anderson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZG4TW--j-DdSsUO6@alley \
--to=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
--cc=daniel.thompson@linaro.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dianders@chromium.org \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=groeck@chromium.org \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=ito-yuichi@fujitsu.com \
--cc=kernelfans@gmail.com \
--cc=kgdb-bugreport@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=lecopzer.chen@mediatek.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=mka@chromium.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=msys.mizuma@gmail.com \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=ravi.v.shankar@intel.com \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=ricardo.neri@intel.com \
--cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sumit.garg@linaro.org \
--cc=swboyd@chromium.org \
--cc=tzungbi@chromium.org \
--cc=wens@csie.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).