Re: [PATCH 1/3] remoteproc: Add Arm remoteproc driver

From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
To: Abdellatif El Khlifi <abdellatif.elkhlifi@arm.com>
Cc: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
	Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau@arm.com>,
	Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
	Drew.Reed@arm.com, Adam.Johnston@arm.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] remoteproc: Add Arm remoteproc driver
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2024 15:24:12 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZfMWnIr6gf5xu2UB@bogus> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240314151653.GA40443@e130802.arm.com>

On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 03:16:53PM +0000, Abdellatif El Khlifi wrote:
> Hi Sudeep,
>
> On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 02:59:20PM +0000, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> >
> > I think Robin has raised few points that need clarification. I think it was
> > done as part of DT binding patch. I share those concerns and I wanted to
> > reaching to the same concerns by starting the questions I asked on corstone
> > device tree changes.
>
> Please have a look at my answer to Robin with clarifications [1].
>

Yes I did take a look at the response but am not convinced yet. I have
responded to you email with other details which I want to be explored.
I don't think we need to rush to add the *foundation driver* as you call
before the bindings are defined well.

--
Regards,
Sudeep