From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754559AbcKIVSG (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Nov 2016 16:18:06 -0500 Received: from lelnx193.ext.ti.com ([198.47.27.77]:60629 "EHLO lelnx193.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754530AbcKIVSE (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Nov 2016 16:18:04 -0500 X-Greylist: delayed 516 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Wed, 09 Nov 2016 16:18:04 EST Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: ethernet: ti: davinci_cpdma: fix fixed prio cpdma ctlr configuration To: Ivan Khoronzhuk , , References: <1478610656-24634-1-git-send-email-ivan.khoronzhuk@linaro.org> CC: , From: Grygorii Strashko Message-ID: Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2016 15:09:22 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1478610656-24634-1-git-send-email-ivan.khoronzhuk@linaro.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [128.247.83.173] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 11/08/2016 07:10 AM, Ivan Khoronzhuk wrote: > The dma ctlr is reseted to 0 while cpdma start, thus cpdma ctlr I assume this is because cpdma_ctlr_start() does soft reset. Is it correct? > cannot be configured after cpdma is stopped. So, restore content > of cpdma ctlr while off/on procedure. > > Based on net-next/master ^ remove it > > Signed-off-by: Ivan Khoronzhuk > --- > drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c | 6 +- > drivers/net/ethernet/ti/davinci_cpdma.c | 103 +++++++++++++++++--------------- > drivers/net/ethernet/ti/davinci_cpdma.h | 2 + > 3 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c > index b1ddf89..4d04b8e 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c > @@ -1376,10 +1376,6 @@ static int cpsw_ndo_open(struct net_device *ndev) > ALE_ALL_PORTS, ALE_ALL_PORTS, 0, 0); > > if (!cpsw_common_res_usage_state(cpsw)) { > - /* setup tx dma to fixed prio and zero offset */ > - cpdma_control_set(cpsw->dma, CPDMA_TX_PRIO_FIXED, 1); > - cpdma_control_set(cpsw->dma, CPDMA_RX_BUFFER_OFFSET, 0); > - > /* disable priority elevation */ > __raw_writel(0, &cpsw->regs->ptype); > > @@ -2710,6 +2706,8 @@ static int cpsw_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > dma_params.desc_align = 16; > dma_params.has_ext_regs = true; > dma_params.desc_hw_addr = dma_params.desc_mem_phys; > + dma_params.rxbuf_offset = 0; > + dma_params.fixed_prio = 1; Do we really need this new parameters? Do you have plans to use other values? -- regards, -grygorii