From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB47EC433F5 for ; Mon, 11 Oct 2021 16:44:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E91860F3A for ; Mon, 11 Oct 2021 16:44:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231669AbhJKQq1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Oct 2021 12:46:27 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([216.205.24.124]:32892 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231439AbhJKQqZ (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Oct 2021 12:46:25 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1633970664; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=v5eQ2fdMZRopXBrJf5sFBVPsk6Ix/lYtLMtjFnBm+68=; b=KZUYjgjYEPFEq2CLQxRc5Q7lPEbPCfDEh/N4tcEr7Y7IVHgHozWwAWEERgClDkXo1FFG1o zNeZM1u1XBb9I25+2AOsMH9X7543gf+oZgLt84dNAzzld3+KTSC8ArqgKgfVY2qMdO30lI QtsgSPXNYVZgfAjPsI9TmJVoyFM5Pgw= Received: from mail-wr1-f71.google.com (mail-wr1-f71.google.com [209.85.221.71]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-309-P_y-ET_2PCywWOHHW-VdTg-1; Mon, 11 Oct 2021 12:44:23 -0400 X-MC-Unique: P_y-ET_2PCywWOHHW-VdTg-1 Received: by mail-wr1-f71.google.com with SMTP id k2-20020adfc702000000b0016006b2da9bso13711274wrg.1 for ; Mon, 11 Oct 2021 09:44:22 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject :content-language:to:cc:references:from:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=v5eQ2fdMZRopXBrJf5sFBVPsk6Ix/lYtLMtjFnBm+68=; b=hoEek47ID84pFpK6A6gL58M50VyC/hcRc/JuOqhB21FbH2qJXkxJsmHPWapRP/EQ3I bUozGf1wRMLfmhA974+vqaUcvpyUHesYkJeZAELoKB89tmViwMaxNxDmCeAcDggxHSDl omR5w2023yqq6GT7jQLSMUJPQu6RatkkkRp8WuXzshYVUq/gBC6B6P/7jZJEKb83ymZt 3P8pIkBGD3MX5SAOO9f85SFz6CVE6KEeoCt5cLfWaVB19BKLemF2JZbM3JTA272Q3GDo nDKP2bWUydokfJYWza5ZuIaN+8wi6olSdxSHwhWuTeri6kpMqOtvRI3SiLBBVYWL10Um dM5A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533BT6S1QclHbXPIvGkNaWpS7I9eiFWWucd6/Dp1zS1zq+3QaT6Y dOiGmQiVujj6gbtxHtV3xl8RM83+StQxq5prAqazPBC2x1n4GvEvUSTEP6PkgbeVVXS7lfr6Au7 uB35zQNbytHpuGNNZuCGSHMNI X-Received: by 2002:a7b:cf06:: with SMTP id l6mr5572wmg.129.1633970661891; Mon, 11 Oct 2021 09:44:21 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzkNV6u5+zpDaiAm71jlzVLgMlxlreNuF/u2+P+xbwTXuHkkQCV+OrxvNWndTmUCXbtqs4IEw== X-Received: by 2002:a7b:cf06:: with SMTP id l6mr5550wmg.129.1633970661692; Mon, 11 Oct 2021 09:44:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPV6:2001:b07:6468:f312:63a7:c72e:ea0e:6045? ([2001:b07:6468:f312:63a7:c72e:ea0e:6045]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w8sm5647263wrr.47.2021.10.11.09.44.20 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 11 Oct 2021 09:44:20 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2021 18:44:19 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] KVM: nVMX: Track whether changes in L0 require MSR bitmap for L2 to be rebuilt Content-Language: en-US To: Vitaly Kuznetsov , Sean Christopherson Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Wanpeng Li , Jim Mattson , Maxim Levitsky , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20211004161029.641155-1-vkuznets@redhat.com> <20211004161029.641155-4-vkuznets@redhat.com> <87zgrfzj9k.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com> From: Paolo Bonzini In-Reply-To: <87zgrfzj9k.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 11/10/21 17:13, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote: >> >> The changelog kind of covers that, but those details will be completely lost to >> readers of the code. > Would it help if we rename 'msr_bitmap_changed' to something? Yeah, what about 'msr_bitmap_force_recalc'? Paolo