From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E464C2BB85 for ; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 10:48:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2068021973 for ; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 10:48:19 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=c-s.fr header.i=@c-s.fr header.b="Q1mfZRzd" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2505497AbgDPKsL (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Apr 2020 06:48:11 -0400 Received: from pegase1.c-s.fr ([93.17.236.30]:51691 "EHLO pegase1.c-s.fr" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2505052AbgDPKgq (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Apr 2020 06:36:46 -0400 Received: from localhost (mailhub1-int [192.168.12.234]) by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id 492wd560Khz9v1KF; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 12:36:41 +0200 (CEST) Authentication-Results: localhost; dkim=pass reason="1024-bit key; insecure key" header.d=c-s.fr header.i=@c-s.fr header.b=Q1mfZRzd; dkim-adsp=pass; dkim-atps=neutral X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at c-s.fr Received: from pegase1.c-s.fr ([192.168.12.234]) by localhost (pegase1.c-s.fr [192.168.12.234]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gjgErL3lbfTm; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 12:36:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: from messagerie.si.c-s.fr (messagerie.si.c-s.fr [192.168.25.192]) by pegase1.c-s.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 492wd54vTKz9v1KC; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 12:36:41 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=c-s.fr; s=mail; t=1587033401; bh=l5FwhWsZFKoNYPFvSBrPZm1J3No4Lds1oXRu+U6EyzE=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=Q1mfZRzdVTVLZ9spIAcjumqoNKfKtAXMhqqu72UQK2qqOHAgzcyZ93dCPB4Z9HBDb eUTezV8zEsorpEL5x5DoxpQ1KoJ4kzp5DqP3jd5KDzneZxqh06kk6xhlxU4YVc9Zbm iebw9fw1oWps8adcEcDcgg+pOfjnMtWRYxvJ/Pmc= Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by messagerie.si.c-s.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29BEB8BBF0; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 12:36:43 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at c-s.fr Received: from messagerie.si.c-s.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (messagerie.si.c-s.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10023) with ESMTP id UL0sASDHqyWS; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 12:36:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.4.90] (unknown [192.168.4.90]) by messagerie.si.c-s.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 991E18B99F; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 12:36:42 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: [PATCH v3,0/4] drivers: uio: new driver uio_fsl_85xx_cache_sram To: =?UTF-8?B?546L5paH6JmO?= Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, oss@buserror.net, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, kernel@vivo.com References: From: Christophe Leroy Message-ID: Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2020 12:36:38 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: fr Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Le 16/04/2020 à 11:29, 王文虎 a écrit : > Hi, > Seems there is something wrong with the server that multiple dumplications > of the v3 patches were sent out, please ignore the rest and take this newest > series as formal count. Which series ? It seems you sent 3 times, at 9:29, 9:41 and 9:49 (Paris Time) From the series of 9:29, I received patches 0 to 3 From the series of 9:41, I received patches 0 to 3 From the series of 9:49, I received patches 0 and 4. Looks like powerpc patchwork (https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linuxppc-dev/list/?submitter=78320) got: From the series of 9:29, I received patches 0 to 4 From the series of 9:41, I received patches 1 to 4 From the series of 9:49, I received patches 1 to 4 So this seems to be something wrong somewhere. Christophe > > Thanks, > Wenhu > > From: Wang Wenhu > Date: 2020-04-16 15:49:14 > To: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,oss@buserror.net,christophe.leroy@c-s.fr,linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org > Cc: kernel@vivo.com,Wang Wenhu > Subject: [PATCH v3,0/4] drivers: uio: new driver uio_fsl_85xx_cache_sram>This series add a new uio driver for freescale 85xx platforms to >> access the Cache-Sram form user level. This is extremely helpful >> for the user-space applications that require high performance memory >> accesses. >> >> It fixes the compile errors and warning of the hardware level drivers >> and implements the uio driver in uio_fsl_85xx_cache_sram.c. >> >> Changes since v1: >> * Addressed comments from Greg K-H >> * Moved kfree(info->name) into uio_info_free_internal() >> >> Changes since v2: >> * Drop the patch that modifies Kconfigs of arch/powerpc/platforms >> and modified the sequence of patches: >> 01:dropped, 02->03, 03->02, 04->01, 05->04 >> * Addressed comments from Greg, Scott and Christophe >> * Use "uiomem->internal_addr" as if condition for sram memory free, >> and memset the uiomem entry >> * Modified of_match_table make the driver apart from Cache-Sram HW info >> which belong to the HW level driver fsl_85xx_cache_sram to match >> * Use roundup_pow_of_two for align calc(really learned a lot from Christophe) >> * Remove useless clear block of uiomem entries. >> * Use UIO_INFO_VER micro for info->version, and define it as >> "devicetree,pseudo", meaning this is pseudo device and probed from >> device tree configuration >> * Select FSL_85XX_CACHE_SRAM rather than depends on it >> >> Wang Wenhu (4): >> powerpc: sysdev: fix compile error for fsl_85xx_l2ctlr >> powerpc: sysdev: fix compile error for fsl_85xx_cache_sram >> powerpc: sysdev: fix compile warning for fsl_85xx_cache_sram >> drivers: uio: new driver for fsl_85xx_cache_sram >> >> arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_85xx_cache_sram.c | 3 +- >> arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_85xx_l2ctlr.c | 1 + >> drivers/uio/Kconfig | 9 ++ >> drivers/uio/Makefile | 1 + >> drivers/uio/uio_fsl_85xx_cache_sram.c | 158 ++++++++++++++++++++++ >> 5 files changed, 171 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >> create mode 100644 drivers/uio/uio_fsl_85xx_cache_sram.c >> >> -- >> 2.17.1 >> > >