Re: [PATCH v3 01/15] perf/mem: Introduce PERF_MEM_LVLNUM_{EXTN_MEM|IO}

[Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@amd.com>]

On 30-Sep-22 4:18 PM, kajoljain wrote:
> 
> 
> On 9/28/22 15:27, Ravi Bangoria wrote:
>> PERF_MEM_LVLNUM_EXTN_MEM which can be used to indicate accesses to
>> extension memory like CXL etc. PERF_MEM_LVL_IO can be used for IO
>> accesses but it can not distinguish between local and remote IO.
>> Introduce new field PERF_MEM_LVLNUM_IO which can be clubbed with
>> PERF_MEM_REMOTE_REMOTE to indicate Remote IO accesses.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@amd.com>
>> ---
>>  include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h | 4 +++-
>>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h b/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
>> index e639c74cf5fb..4ae3c249f675 100644
>> --- a/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
>> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
>> @@ -1336,7 +1336,9 @@ union perf_mem_data_src {
>>  #define PERF_MEM_LVLNUM_L2	0x02 /* L2 */
>>  #define PERF_MEM_LVLNUM_L3	0x03 /* L3 */
>>  #define PERF_MEM_LVLNUM_L4	0x04 /* L4 */
>> -/* 5-0xa available */
>> +/* 5-0x8 available */
>> +#define PERF_MEM_LVLNUM_EXTN_MEM 0x09 /* Extension memory */
> 
> Hi Ravi,
>     Here we are adding entry explicitly for accesses to Extension memory
> like CXL. In future if we want to extend it for cache or other accesses
> , we again need to add new entries.
> Can we rather add single entry say PERF_MEM_LVLNUM_EXTN and further can
> use reserved bits to specify memory/cache?

Is everybody okay with this:

#define PERF_MEM_LVLNUM_EXTN	0x09 /* CXL */

And a 3 bit variable to define what type of cxl that would be:

#define PERF_MEM_EXTN_CXL_ANY	0x1
#define PERF_MEM_EXTN_CXL_MEM	0x2
#define PERF_MEM_EXTN_CXL_CACHE	0x2
#define PERF_MEM_EXTN_CXL_IO	0x3

Peter, Shall I send this as addon patch series or are you okay reverting
current patches?

Thanks,
Ravi