From: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>
To: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@embeddedor.com>,
Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@windriver.com>
Cc: kgdb-bugreport@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kdb: kdb_main: mark expected switch fall-throughs
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2018 15:34:06 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a47008fd-1e52-a268-8085-a2cdcd5dce01@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180805041454.GA18449@embeddedor.com>
On 05/08/18 05:14, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
> where we are expecting to fall through.
>
> Addresses-Coverity-ID: 115090 ("Missing break in switch")
> Addresses-Coverity-ID: 115091 ("Missing break in switch")
> Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114700 ("Missing break in switch")
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Adding fall through isn't wrong but its reasonable to ask why there is a
complex hand unrolled loop here in the first place (and doubly so
without a comment). The whole switch statement would be much clear
expressed as:
for (j=0; j<bytesperword; j++)
*c++ = printable_char(*cp++);
addr += bytesperword;
Daniel.
> ---
> kernel/debug/kdb/kdb_main.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/debug/kdb/kdb_main.c b/kernel/debug/kdb/kdb_main.c
> index 2ddfce8..2249645 100644
> --- a/kernel/debug/kdb/kdb_main.c
> +++ b/kernel/debug/kdb/kdb_main.c
> @@ -1545,13 +1545,16 @@ static void kdb_md_line(const char *fmtstr, unsigned long addr,
> *c++ = printable_char(*cp++);
> *c++ = printable_char(*cp++);
> addr += 4;
> + /* fall through */
> case 4:
> *c++ = printable_char(*cp++);
> *c++ = printable_char(*cp++);
> addr += 2;
> + /* fall through */
> case 2:
> *c++ = printable_char(*cp++);
> addr++;
> + /* fall through */
> case 1:
> *c++ = printable_char(*cp++);
> addr++;
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-08-15 14:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-08-05 4:14 [PATCH] kdb: kdb_main: mark expected switch fall-throughs Gustavo A. R. Silva
2018-08-15 14:34 ` Daniel Thompson [this message]
2018-08-15 14:43 ` Gustavo A. R. Silva
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a47008fd-1e52-a268-8085-a2cdcd5dce01@linaro.org \
--to=daniel.thompson@linaro.org \
--cc=gustavo@embeddedor.com \
--cc=jason.wessel@windriver.com \
--cc=kgdb-bugreport@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).