linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Mickaël Salaün" <mic@digikod.net>
To: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	x86@kernel.org, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Mickaël Salaün" <mic@linux.microsoft.com>,
	"Andy Lutomirski" <luto@kernel.org>,
	"Brian Gerst" <brgerst@gmail.com>,
	"Dominik Brodowski" <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>,
	"James Morris" <jmorris@namei.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] x86/syscalls: fix -Wmissing-prototypes warnings from COND_SYSCALL()
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2021 12:48:13 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a47312ad-8d62-b740-49cd-d1065bb76d76@digikod.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210301131533.64671-2-masahiroy@kernel.org>

Hi Masahiro,

What is the status of this patch? Could you please push it to -next?
This would avoid emails from lkp:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-security-module/202103191423.Jl0jVzfL-lkp@intel.com/

Thanks,
 Mickaël

On 01/03/2021 14:15, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> Building kernel/sys_ni.c with W=1 emits tons of -Wmissing-prototypes
> warnings.
> 
> $ make W=1 kernel/sys_ni.o
>   [ snip ]
>   CC      kernel/sys_ni.o
> In file included from kernel/sys_ni.c:10:
> ./arch/x86/include/asm/syscall_wrapper.h:83:14: warning: no previous prototype for '__x64_sys_io_setup' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
>    83 |  __weak long __##abi##_##name(const struct pt_regs *__unused) \
>       |              ^~
> ./arch/x86/include/asm/syscall_wrapper.h:100:2: note: in expansion of macro '__COND_SYSCALL'
>   100 |  __COND_SYSCALL(x64, sys_##name)
>       |  ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> ./arch/x86/include/asm/syscall_wrapper.h:256:2: note: in expansion of macro '__X64_COND_SYSCALL'
>   256 |  __X64_COND_SYSCALL(name)     \
>       |  ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> kernel/sys_ni.c:39:1: note: in expansion of macro 'COND_SYSCALL'
>    39 | COND_SYSCALL(io_setup);
>       | ^~~~~~~~~~~~
> ./arch/x86/include/asm/syscall_wrapper.h:83:14: warning: no previous prototype for '__ia32_sys_io_setup' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
>    83 |  __weak long __##abi##_##name(const struct pt_regs *__unused) \
>       |              ^~
> ./arch/x86/include/asm/syscall_wrapper.h:120:2: note: in expansion of macro '__COND_SYSCALL'
>   120 |  __COND_SYSCALL(ia32, sys_##name)
>       |  ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> ./arch/x86/include/asm/syscall_wrapper.h:257:2: note: in expansion of macro '__IA32_COND_SYSCALL'
>   257 |  __IA32_COND_SYSCALL(name)
>       |  ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> kernel/sys_ni.c:39:1: note: in expansion of macro 'COND_SYSCALL'
>    39 | COND_SYSCALL(io_setup);
>       | ^~~~~~~~~~~~
>   ...
> 
> __SYS_STUB0() and __SYS_STUBx() defined a few lines above have forward
> declarations. Let's do likewise for __COND_SYSCALL() to fix the
> warnings.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
> Tested-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@linux.microsoft.com>
> ---
> 
>  arch/x86/include/asm/syscall_wrapper.h | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/syscall_wrapper.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/syscall_wrapper.h
> index a84333adeef2..80c08c7d5e72 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/syscall_wrapper.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/syscall_wrapper.h
> @@ -80,6 +80,7 @@ extern long __ia32_sys_ni_syscall(const struct pt_regs *regs);
>  	}
>  
>  #define __COND_SYSCALL(abi, name)					\
> +	__weak long __##abi##_##name(const struct pt_regs *__unused);	\
>  	__weak long __##abi##_##name(const struct pt_regs *__unused)	\
>  	{								\
>  		return sys_ni_syscall();				\
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2021-03-25 11:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-01 13:15 [PATCH 0/7] x86: fix warnings and refactor syscall code Masahiro Yamada
2021-03-01 13:15 ` [PATCH 1/7] x86/syscalls: fix -Wmissing-prototypes warnings from COND_SYSCALL() Masahiro Yamada
2021-03-25 11:48   ` Mickaël Salaün [this message]
2021-03-25 14:31     ` Masahiro Yamada
2021-04-09  4:48       ` Masahiro Yamada
2021-03-25 15:27   ` [tip: x86/cleanups] x86/syscalls: Fix " tip-bot2 for Masahiro Yamada
2021-03-01 13:15 ` [PATCH 2/7] x86/entry/x32: rename __x32_compat_sys_* to __x64_compat_sys_* Masahiro Yamada
2021-03-01 13:15 ` [PATCH 3/7] x86/syscalls: switch to generic syscalltbl.sh Masahiro Yamada
2021-03-01 13:15 ` [PATCH 4/7] x86/syscalls: stop filling syscall arrays with *_sys_ni_syscall Masahiro Yamada
2021-03-01 13:15 ` [PATCH 5/7] x86/unistd: define X32_NR_syscalls only for 64-bit kernel Masahiro Yamada
2021-03-01 13:15 ` [PATCH 6/7] x86/syscalls: use __NR_syscalls instead of __NR_syscall_max Masahiro Yamada
2021-03-01 13:15 ` [PATCH 7/7] x86/syscalls: switch to generic syscallhdr.sh Masahiro Yamada

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a47312ad-8d62-b740-49cd-d1065bb76d76@digikod.net \
    --to=mic@digikod.net \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=brgerst@gmail.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jmorris@namei.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@dominikbrodowski.net \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=masahiroy@kernel.org \
    --cc=mic@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).