linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: heyunlei 00015531 <heyunlei@hihonor.com>
To: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>, Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, chao@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] f2fs: reduce expensive checkpoint trigger frequency
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2021 20:35:04 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a58dc4a1-b2b7-8446-d2de-14fffee36852@hihonor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <733ba2da-4047-045b-5223-05012b980603@huawei.com>


在 2021/4/22 15:14, Chao Yu 写道:
> On 2021/4/22 12:06, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
>> On 04/16, Chao Yu wrote:
>>> We may trigger high frequent checkpoint for below case:
>>> 1. mkdir /mnt/dir1; set dir1 encrypted
>>> 2. touch /mnt/file1; fsync /mnt/file1
>>> 3. mkdir /mnt/dir2; set dir2 encrypted
>>> 4. touch /mnt/file2; fsync /mnt/file2
>>> ...
>>>
>>> Although, newly created dir and file are not related, due to
>>> commit bbf156f7afa7 ("f2fs: fix lost xattrs of directories"), we will
>>> trigger checkpoint whenever fsync() comes after a new encrypted dir
>>> created.
>>
>> It'll happen once? How much impact will we hit due to this?
>
> Yunlei reports me this issue, the problems here in Honer device's 
> specified
> environment, most fsync() on regular file triggers a checkpoint() when 
> mkdir()
> happened concurrently, result in causing the performance issue.
>
> Yunlei could explain more about details of this issue. @Yunlei

Hi all,

     Many apps launch will create new directories,which will set need 
checkpoint flag because

inherited  crypto info from their parent. During this time,  any 
fsynced  will write a new cp.

For the worst case:

     new dir1

                     fsync file a  (with no relations with dir1), and 
write cp  n

     new dir 2

                     fsync file b (with no relations with dir2), and 
write cp n + 1

     ... ...


Thanks.

>
>>
>>>
>>> In order to avoid such condition, let's record an entry including
>>> directory's ino into global cache when we initialize encryption policy
>>> in a checkpointed directory, and then only trigger checkpoint() when
>>> target file's parent has non-persisted encryption policy, for the case
>>> its parent is not checkpointed, need_do_checkpoint() has cover that
>>> by verifying it with f2fs_is_checkpointed_node().
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
>>> ---
>>>   fs/f2fs/f2fs.h              | 2 ++
>>>   fs/f2fs/file.c              | 3 +++
>>>   fs/f2fs/xattr.c             | 6 ++++--
>>>   include/trace/events/f2fs.h | 3 ++-
>>>   4 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
>>> index 87d734f5589d..34487e527d12 100644
>>> --- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
>>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
>>> @@ -246,6 +246,7 @@ enum {
>>>       APPEND_INO,        /* for append ino list */
>>>       UPDATE_INO,        /* for update ino list */
>>>       TRANS_DIR_INO,        /* for trasactions dir ino list */
>>> +    ENC_DIR_INO,        /* for encrypted dir ino list */
>>>       FLUSH_INO,        /* for multiple device flushing */
>>>       MAX_INO_ENTRY,        /* max. list */
>>>   };
>>> @@ -1090,6 +1091,7 @@ enum cp_reason_type {
>>>       CP_FASTBOOT_MODE,
>>>       CP_SPEC_LOG_NUM,
>>>       CP_RECOVER_DIR,
>>> +    CP_ENC_DIR,
>>>   };
>>>     enum iostat_type {
>>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/file.c b/fs/f2fs/file.c
>>> index 6284b2f4a60b..a6c38d8b1ec3 100644
>>> --- a/fs/f2fs/file.c
>>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/file.c
>>> @@ -218,6 +218,9 @@ static inline enum cp_reason_type 
>>> need_do_checkpoint(struct inode *inode)
>>>           f2fs_exist_written_data(sbi, F2FS_I(inode)->i_pino,
>>>                               TRANS_DIR_INO))
>>>           cp_reason = CP_RECOVER_DIR;
>>> +    else if (f2fs_exist_written_data(sbi, F2FS_I(inode)->i_pino,
>>> +                            ENC_DIR_INO))
>>> +        cp_reason = CP_ENC_DIR;
>>>         return cp_reason;
>>>   }
>>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/xattr.c b/fs/f2fs/xattr.c
>>> index c8f34decbf8e..38796d488d15 100644
>>> --- a/fs/f2fs/xattr.c
>>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/xattr.c
>>> @@ -630,6 +630,7 @@ static int __f2fs_setxattr(struct inode *inode, 
>>> int index,
>>>               const char *name, const void *value, size_t size,
>>>               struct page *ipage, int flags)
>>>   {
>>> +    struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi = F2FS_I_SB(inode);
>>>       struct f2fs_xattr_entry *here, *last;
>>>       void *base_addr, *last_base_addr;
>>>       int found, newsize;
>>> @@ -745,8 +746,9 @@ static int __f2fs_setxattr(struct inode *inode, 
>>> int index,
>>>               !strcmp(name, F2FS_XATTR_NAME_ENCRYPTION_CONTEXT))
>>>           f2fs_set_encrypted_inode(inode);
>>>       f2fs_mark_inode_dirty_sync(inode, true);
>>> -    if (!error && S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode))
>>> -        set_sbi_flag(F2FS_I_SB(inode), SBI_NEED_CP);
>>> +    if (!error && S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode) &&
>>> +            f2fs_is_checkpointed_node(sbi, inode->i_ino))
>>> +        f2fs_add_ino_entry(sbi, inode->i_ino, ENC_DIR_INO);
>>
>> Is it right to say ENC_DIR_INO in this case?
>
> Sorry, I didn't get it.
>
> Thanks,
>
>>
>>>     same:
>>>       if (is_inode_flag_set(inode, FI_ACL_MODE)) {
>>> diff --git a/include/trace/events/f2fs.h b/include/trace/events/f2fs.h
>>> index 56b113e3cd6a..ca0cf12226e9 100644
>>> --- a/include/trace/events/f2fs.h
>>> +++ b/include/trace/events/f2fs.h
>>> @@ -145,7 +145,8 @@ TRACE_DEFINE_ENUM(CP_RESIZE);
>>>           { CP_NODE_NEED_CP,    "node needs cp" },        \
>>>           { CP_FASTBOOT_MODE,    "fastboot mode" },        \
>>>           { CP_SPEC_LOG_NUM,    "log type is 2" },        \
>>> -        { CP_RECOVER_DIR,    "dir needs recovery" })
>>> +        { CP_RECOVER_DIR,    "dir needs recovery" },        \
>>> +        { CP_ENC_DIR,        "persist encryption policy" })
>>>     #define show_shutdown_mode(type)                    \
>>>       __print_symbolic(type,                        \
>>> -- 
>>> 2.29.2
>> .
>>


  reply	other threads:[~2021-04-22 12:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-16  9:58 [RFC PATCH] f2fs: reduce expensive checkpoint trigger frequency Chao Yu
2021-04-22  3:24 ` [f2fs-dev] " heyunlei 00015531
2021-04-22  4:06 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2021-04-22  7:14   ` Chao Yu
2021-04-22 12:35     ` heyunlei 00015531 [this message]
2021-04-25  0:52     ` Jaegeuk Kim

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a58dc4a1-b2b7-8446-d2de-14fffee36852@hihonor.com \
    --to=heyunlei@hihonor.com \
    --cc=chao@kernel.org \
    --cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=yuchao0@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).