From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1755216AbcKJKv0 (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Thu, 10 Nov 2016 05:51:26 -0500
Received: from mx0a-000f0801.pphosted.com ([67.231.144.122]:42055 "EHLO
        mx0a-000f0801.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK)
        by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752771AbcKJKvX (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Thu, 10 Nov 2016 05:51:23 -0500
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/cpuid: Deal with broken firmware once more
To: "M. Vefa Bicakci" <m.v.b@runbox.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
References: <20161102122557.qs4rl6mb7n7l7j7p@linutronix.de>
 <24e69019-60d0-29e7-e31f-c6f00f9ed98a@brocade.com>
 <alpine.DEB.2.20.1611071717000.3709@nanos>
 <58e229e2-91f4-a97f-1b9f-089f48ef994a@brocade.com>
 <alpine.DEB.2.20.1611072117040.3501@nanos>
 <e3a6f9cb-ee46-6e5c-7b2e-9a6ed2fc949e@brocade.com>
 <alpine.DEB.2.20.1611081525160.3501@nanos>
 <86609338-2b45-ed7e-fb07-99421e43a2f1@brocade.com>
 <alpine.DEB.2.20.1611081721330.3501@nanos>
 <alpine.DEB.2.20.1611091613540.3501@nanos>
 <49fe8cc5-0f0f-6cac-7a5c-803e81f5667d@runbox.com>
CC: "x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
From: "Charles (Chas) Williams" <ciwillia@brocade.com>
Message-ID: <a5f579c2-3a2d-3cce-cf3e-d68b91bb2d73@brocade.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2016 05:50:16 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
 Icedove/45.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <49fe8cc5-0f0f-6cac-7a5c-803e81f5667d@runbox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-ClientProxiedBy: hq1wp-excas12.corp.brocade.com (10.70.38.22) To
 BRMWP-EXMB12.corp.brocade.com (172.16.59.130)
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:,, definitions=2016-11-10_03:,,
 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0
 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015
 lowpriorityscore=0 impostorscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0
 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1609300000 definitions=main-1611100190
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org



On 11/09/2016 10:57 PM, M. Vefa Bicakci wrote:
> [    0.002000] mvb: CPU: Physical Processor ID: 0
> [    0.002000] mvb: CPU: Processor Core ID: 0
> [    0.002000] mvb: identify_cpu:1112: c: ffff880013b0a040, c->logical_proc_id: 65535
> [    0.002000] mvb: __default_cpu_present_to_apicid:612: Returning 65535! mps_cpu: 1, nr_cpu_ids: 2, cpu_present(mps_cpu): 1
> [    0.002000] smpboot: mvb: topology_update_package_map:270: cpu: 1, pkg: 4095
> [    0.002000] smpboot: APIC(ffff) Converting physical 4095 to logical package 0
> [    0.002000] smpboot: mvb: topology_update_package_map:305: cpu: 1, cpu_data(cpu).logical_proc_id: 0

This seems strange.  0xffff is BAD_APICID.  Why didn't this fail here:

         for_each_present_cpu(cpu) {
                 unsigned int apicid = apic->cpu_present_to_apicid(cpu);

                 if (apicid == BAD_APICID || !apic->apic_id_valid(apicid))  <<<<<<<<<<
                         continue;
                 if (!topology_update_package_map(apicid, cpu))
                         continue;

topology_update_package_map() should never have been called?