linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
To: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	x86@kernel.org, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/4] x86/vmemmap: Drop handling of 1GB vmemmap ranges
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2021 10:34:51 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a701a162-d581-42e9-bae5-7c43741bbf7b@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210309174113.5597-3-osalvador@suse.de>

On 3/9/21 9:41 AM, Oscar Salvador wrote:
> We never get to allocate 1GB pages when mapping the vmemmap range.
> Drop the dead code both for the aligned and unaligned cases and leave
> only the direct map handling.

I was hoping to seem some more meat in this changelog, possibly some of
what David Hildenbrand said in the v4 thread about this patch.
Basically, we don't have code to allocate 1G mappings because it isn't
clear that it would be worth the complexity, and it might also waste memory.

I'm fine with the code, but I would appreciate a beefed-up changelog:

Acked-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>

  reply	other threads:[~2021-03-09 18:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-09 17:41 [PATCH v5 0/4] Cleanup and fixups for vmemmap handling Oscar Salvador
2021-03-09 17:41 ` [PATCH v5 1/4] x86/vmemmap: Drop handling of 4K unaligned vmemmap range Oscar Salvador
2021-03-09 17:41 ` [PATCH v5 2/4] x86/vmemmap: Drop handling of 1GB vmemmap ranges Oscar Salvador
2021-03-09 18:34   ` Dave Hansen [this message]
2021-03-09 21:27     ` Oscar Salvador
2021-03-09 17:41 ` [PATCH v5 3/4] x86/vmemmap: Handle unpopulated sub-pmd ranges Oscar Salvador
2021-03-09 17:52   ` David Hildenbrand
2021-03-10 17:49     ` Oscar Salvador
2021-03-10 17:58       ` David Hildenbrand
2021-03-10 21:58         ` Oscar Salvador
2021-03-11 16:38           ` David Hildenbrand
2021-03-09 18:39   ` Dave Hansen
2021-03-09 17:41 ` [PATCH v5 4/4] x86/vmemmap: Optimize for consecutive sections in partial populated PMDs Oscar Salvador
2021-03-09 18:50   ` Dave Hansen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a701a162-d581-42e9-bae5-7c43741bbf7b@intel.com \
    --to=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=osalvador@suse.de \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).