From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758049AbYAVIZT (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Jan 2008 03:25:19 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754774AbYAVIZF (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Jan 2008 03:25:05 -0500 Received: from ag-out-0708.google.com ([72.14.246.240]:28973 "EHLO ag-out-0708.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754704AbYAVIZB (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Jan 2008 03:25:01 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=HXwZLnSdtiyNsT4EmmBbSl8IcQnp7k1MVi9wBjO16V+hryaO9BeLDOVXAmasNlUS2koUdYA5dqiCAAMbtemLX9705sDZO2I4vSG5O8CGZ13mavPieU0tIzryTDlKSClgxFIH0fVBkcvD0po9K7ugehZee4hcHgZ5YNwhCwktDxw= Message-ID: Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 16:24:58 +0800 From: "Dave Young" To: "Marcel Holtmann" Subject: Re: [PATCH] bluetooth : move children of connection device to NULL before connection down Cc: "David Miller" , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bluez-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com, gombasg@sztaki.hu, htejun@gmail.com, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, kay.sievers@vrfy.org, greg@kroah.com In-Reply-To: <1200982696.7978.148.camel@aeonflux> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20080121044913.GA4162@darkstar.te-china.tietoenator.com> <20080121045401.GB4162@darkstar.te-china.tietoenator.com> <20080121.031417.171098597.davem@davemloft.net> <1200982696.7978.148.camel@aeonflux> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Jan 22, 2008 2:18 PM, Marcel Holtmann wrote: > Hi Dave, > > > > Add people missed in cc-list. > > > > Thanks Dave for your continued efforts on Bluetooth bugs like this. > > > > Marcel, are you going to review/ACK/integrate/push-upstream/whatever > > any of these Bluetooth patches? > > > > It hasn't been getting much love from you as of late, you are one of > > the listed maintainers, and I don't want to lose any of Dave's > > valuable bug fixing work. Thanks. > > I will be fully back in business next week. Just got stuck in a project > that needed 200% of my time to get it going. > > > Or should I just handle it all directly? > > I followed the list only a little bit, but from what I have seen is that > Dave is doing a great job in tracking all issues down to the real cause. Thanks. > > I had a look at his last patch and after review, I agree that this is a > possible solution. I only have two nitpicks about the coding style. So > in del_conn the struct device declaration should be made after the > struct hci_conn assignment from the container and I would put an extra > empty line before the devel_del, put_device block. Nitpicks only. Marcel, could you tell something more about your coding style? I would like to submit patches about bluetooth according to your sytle later If I have. Maybe you could put it on the bluez web site or anywhere. > > Right now I can't think of any side effects by this patch. Actually I > only see an improvement with this patch. So please take it directly and > starting with next week, I gonna make sure that they are handled again > properly by me. > > Regards > > Marcel > > >