From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3A27C4332F for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2021 15:54:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S242981AbhK3P56 (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Nov 2021 10:57:58 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:47968 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230247AbhK3P54 (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Nov 2021 10:57:56 -0500 Received: from mail-lf1-x12a.google.com (mail-lf1-x12a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::12a]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 65D1FC061574; Tue, 30 Nov 2021 07:54:37 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-lf1-x12a.google.com with SMTP id l22so54937952lfg.7; Tue, 30 Nov 2021 07:54:37 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=U5qik7JkxsV5L1nyIiJAzLGGqdU8Lv8lfNJJdZtpwB0=; b=RylwZe89Gypz3GfzQSBHd0yTJdUBDZytxEh0mEKj30BcarBB4LEdiIcNBm+4gc2f7l 6lhx7QrVSHrj3DhV7qmkd8tGWUmyM8xsXbocB6Z+O9SVijMvhXlnAVxD8CwuZTCXCDgV HP81x3lmR8wGcfB3cd/sQYSjmGp/Xf3WrdKqFn4XEuN/KMnCjrnnSdclgF7AL81C6wWA U1ssQsizpD3vG2qtB1jbdA2tLh+79Z8NWh53EhmDBdL6vWrQz1/FKKY7REB/ckXWLN5d yIBhDKP5SSC2QUxiovsBjVhKbpimlyiEKhoFpIH+46pR8ZI6VuAaB50DCxAjtSlytoJU t8xQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=U5qik7JkxsV5L1nyIiJAzLGGqdU8Lv8lfNJJdZtpwB0=; b=rc6ReoR/WDYe5OJVi8/7//nScR0dvO1knpvdJQs5EwtaA3WIfv2XxZmgXGdvAwRjDH ANth6O+cvf/oZ0auOVbT91uufHBILyzGyTJZW1A6KADwjQevtUKwZf3JH/PUIEI4MIXV fmeLKzWczSQRl26ZQmCDbnYtDQBCNZAylSFObIaoFqghxXMxO7jF6aclZ6zYK18+WdXz 9P9hCw2fGWLhfZnWSEwNh1gTpfRpMjfZTcYjLvD2sO/jxvC68THlDucQnSNlf6h0mymG rzS2Qcks6HPXGLBuP+8qXrXIB8GIUCr+zLC2b2bqZZ9duPy6q7t1HGFKzUTkrvO8FJ84 z0mA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532oGxr8ape2Yoq3JqL4ozXhGz5JYjZUQa+CeaSmWPYt4E3BArL6 wALdnZ934dVeB+rvf4Q+E1Yt46LyjD4= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy7QhmKwfLB5R6+JEk12Qsc2zj/1kqkJEqaJM8bGr5pAdx1OFEqLSkVbe3uceco1zRz+Cg/Gg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:39c7:: with SMTP id k7mr10824lfu.571.1638287675500; Tue, 30 Nov 2021 07:54:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.2.145] (94-29-46-111.dynamic.spd-mgts.ru. [94.29.46.111]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id b13sm1985266lfv.200.2021.11.30.07.54.34 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 30 Nov 2021 07:54:35 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] dt-bindings: sharp,lq101r1sx01: Add compatible for LQ101R1SX03 To: Rob Herring Cc: Thierry Reding , Sam Ravnborg , David Airlie , Daniel Vetter , Anton Bambura , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20211114200717.28986-1-digetx@gmail.com> <20211114200717.28986-2-digetx@gmail.com> From: Dmitry Osipenko Message-ID: Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2021 18:54:34 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 30.11.2021 00:32, Rob Herring пишет: > On Sun, Nov 14, 2021 at 11:07:16PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote: >> From: Anton Bambura >> >> LQ101R1SX03 is compatible with LQ101R1SX01, document it. > > Then sounds like '"sharp,lq101r1sx03", "sharp,lq101r1sx01"' would be the > appropriate compatible value. Do that, and you don't need a driver > change. Apparently you're right. The "sharp,lq101r1sx03" should be a slightly improved revision of "sharp,lq101r1sx01". I see now that LQ101R1SX03 is sold as a spare part panel for ASUS TF701T, hence these panels should be entirely compatible with each other.