Re: [PATCH 11/13] mtd: spinand: Add support for Power-on-Reset (PoR) instruction

[Apurva Nandan <a-nandan@ti.com>]

Hi Miquèl,

On 20/08/21 7:47 pm, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> Hi Apurva,
> 
> Apurva Nandan <a-nandan@ti.com> wrote on Fri, 20 Aug 2021 19:11:58
> +0530:
> 
>> Hi Miquèl,
>>
>> On 20/08/21 5:48 pm, Miquel Raynal wrote:
>>> Hi Apurva,
>>>
>>> Apurva Nandan <a-nandan@ti.com> wrote on Fri, 20 Aug 2021 17:09:07
>>> +0530:
>>>    
>>>> Hi Miquèl,
>>>>
>>>> On 07/08/21 12:38 am, Miquel Raynal wrote:
>>>>> Hi Apurva,
>>>>>
>>>>> Apurva Nandan <a-nandan@ti.com> wrote on Tue, 13 Jul 2021 13:05:36
>>>>> +0000:
>>>>>     >>>> Manufacturers like Gigadevice and Winbond are adding Power-on-Reset
>>>>>> functionality in their SPI NAND flash chips. PoR instruction consists
>>>>>> of a 66h command followed by 99h command, and is different from the FFh
>>>>>> reset. The reset command FFh just clears the status only registers,
>>>>>> while the PoR command erases all the configurations written to the
>>>>>> flash and is equivalent to a power-down -> power-up cycle.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Add support for the Power-on-Reset command for any flash that provides
>>>>>> this feature.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Datasheet: https://www.winbond.com/export/sites/winbond/datasheet/W35N01JW_Datasheet_Brief.pdf
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Apurva Nandan <a-nandan@ti.com>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>
>>>>> [...]
>>>>> 				\
>>>>>> @@ -218,6 +230,8 @@ struct spinand_device;
>>>>>>      * reading/programming/erasing when the RESET occurs. Since we always
>>>>>>      * issue a RESET when the device is IDLE, 5us is selected for both initial
>>>>>>      * and poll delay.
>>>>>> + * Power on Reset can take max upto 500 us to complete, so sleep for 1000 us
>>>>>
>>>>> s/max upto/up to/
>>>>>     >>
>>>> Okay!
>>>>   
>>>>>> + * to 1200 us safely.
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't really get why, if the maximum is 500, then let's wait for
>>>>> 500us.
>>>>>     >>
>>>> Generally we keep some margin from the maximum time, no?
>>>
>>> Well, yes and no.
>>>
>>> If you know that an operation will last Xms and have nothing else to
>>> do, then you can take some margin if you are in a probe (called once)
>>> but definitely not if you are in a fast path.
>>>    
>>
>> I think as PoR reset would be called at every mtd_suspend() call, so we can reduce the delay. And we would be expecting some time gap before the next mtd_resume() call.
>>
>>> Otherwise the best is to have some kind of signaling but I'm not sure
>>> you'll have one for the reset op...
>>>    
>>
>> According to public datasheet, it doesn't set the busy bit during reset.
>>
>> So do you suggest in the favor of removing the delay margin?
> 
> Well, it's microseconds, maybe you can reduce it a little bit but that
> will be ok.
> 

Yes, I got it. Will improve this in v2. Thanks!

>>
>>>>   
>>>>>>      */
>>>>>>     #define SPINAND_READ_INITIAL_DELAY_US	6
>>>>>>     #define SPINAND_READ_POLL_DELAY_US	5
>>>>>> @@ -227,6 +241,8 @@ struct spinand_device;
>>>>>>     #define SPINAND_WRITE_POLL_DELAY_US	15
>>>>>>     #define SPINAND_ERASE_INITIAL_DELAY_US	250
>>>>>>     #define SPINAND_ERASE_POLL_DELAY_US	50
>>>>>> +#define SPINAND_POR_MIN_DELAY_US	1000
>>>>>> +#define SPINAND_POR_MAX_DELAY_US	1200
>>>>>>     >>   #define SPINAND_WAITRDY_TIMEOUT_MS	400
>>>>>>     >> @@ -351,6 +367,7 @@ struct spinand_ecc_info {
>>>>>>     #define SPINAND_HAS_QE_BIT		BIT(0)
>>>>>>     #define SPINAND_HAS_CR_FEAT_BIT		BIT(1)
>>>>>>     #define SPINAND_HAS_OCTAL_DTR_BIT	BIT(2)
>>>>>> +#define SPINAND_HAS_POR_CMD_BIT		BIT(3)
>>>>>>     >>   /**
>>>>>>      * struct spinand_ondie_ecc_conf - private SPI-NAND on-die ECC engine structure
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Miquèl
>>>>>
>>>>> ______________________________________________________
>>>>> Linux MTD discussion mailing list
>>>>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/
>>>>>     >>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Apurva Nandan
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Miquèl
>>>    
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Apurva Nandan
> 
> Thanks,
> Miquèl
> 

Thanks,
Apurva Nandan