From: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
To: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Fangrui Song <maskray@google.com>, "KE . LI" <like1@oppo.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz>, Jessica Yu <jeyu@kernel.org>,
Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org>,
Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@google.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] kallsyms: strip LTO suffixes from static functions
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2021 12:45:59 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a970613b-014f-be76-e342-4a51e792b56d@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210628190509.2486992-1-ndesaulniers@google.com>
On 6/28/2021 12:05 PM, 'Nick Desaulniers' via Clang Built Linux wrote:
> Similar to:
> commit 8b8e6b5d3b01 ("kallsyms: strip ThinLTO hashes from static
> functions")
>
> It's very common for compilers to modify the symbol name for static
> functions as part of optimizing transformations. That makes hooking
> static functions (that weren't inlined or DCE'd) with kprobes difficult.
>
> LLVM has yet another name mangling scheme used by thin LTO. Strip off
> these suffixes so that we can continue to hook such static functions.
>
> Reported-by: KE.LI(Lieke) <like1@oppo.com>
> Signed-off-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
> ---
> Changes v1 -> v2:
> * Both mangling schemes can occur for thinLTO + CFI, this new scheme can
> also occur for thinLTO without CFI. Split cleanup_symbol_name() into
> two function calls.
> * Drop KE.LI's tested by tag.
> * Do not carry Fangrui's Reviewed by tag.
> * Drop the inline keyword; it is meaningless.
>
> kernel/kallsyms.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/kallsyms.c b/kernel/kallsyms.c
> index 4067564ec59f..fbce4a1ec700 100644
> --- a/kernel/kallsyms.c
> +++ b/kernel/kallsyms.c
> @@ -171,14 +171,30 @@ static unsigned long kallsyms_sym_address(int idx)
> return kallsyms_relative_base - 1 - kallsyms_offsets[idx];
> }
>
> -#if defined(CONFIG_CFI_CLANG) && defined(CONFIG_LTO_CLANG_THIN)
> +#ifdef CONFIG_LTO_CLANG_THIN
> +/*
> + * LLVM appends a suffix for local variables that must be promoted to global
> + * scope as part of thin LTO. foo() becomes foo.llvm.974640843467629774. This
> + * can break hooking of static functions with kprobes.
> + */
> +static bool cleanup_symbol_name_thinlto(char *s)
> +{
> + char *res;
> +
> + res = strstr(s, ".llvm.");
> + if (res)
> + *res = '\0';
> +
> + return res != NULL;
> +}
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CFI_CLANG
> /*
> * LLVM appends a hash to static function names when ThinLTO and CFI are
> * both enabled, i.e. foo() becomes foo$707af9a22804d33c81801f27dcfe489b.
> * This causes confusion and potentially breaks user space tools, so we
> * strip the suffix from expanded symbol names.
> */
> -static inline bool cleanup_symbol_name(char *s)
> +static bool cleanup_symbol_name_thinlto_cfi(char *s)
> {
> char *res;
>
> @@ -189,8 +205,17 @@ static inline bool cleanup_symbol_name(char *s)
> return res != NULL;
> }
> #else
> -static inline bool cleanup_symbol_name(char *s) { return false; }
> -#endif
> +static bool cleanup_symbol_name_thinlto_cfi(char *s) { return false; }
> +#endif /* CONFIG_CFI_CLANG */
> +#else
> +static bool cleanup_symbol_name_thinlto(char *s) { return false; }
> +#endif /* CONFIG_LTO_CLANG_THIN */
> +
> +static bool cleanup_symbol_name(char *s)
> +{
> + return cleanup_symbol_name_thinlto(s) &&
> + cleanup_symbol_name_thinlto_cfi(s);
Won't this be a build error when CONFIG_LTO_CLANG_THIN=n and
CONFIG_CFI_CLANG=n because cleanup_symbol_name_thinlto_cfi() will not be
defined? Should the cleanup_symbol_name_thinlto_cfi() stub be in the
last else block?
Cheers,
Nathan
> +}
>
> /* Lookup the address for this symbol. Returns 0 if not found. */
> unsigned long kallsyms_lookup_name(const char *name)
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-28 19:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-22 18:38 [PATCH] kallsyms: strip LTO suffixes from static functions Nick Desaulniers
2021-06-22 20:18 ` Fangrui Song
2021-06-28 17:54 ` Nick Desaulniers
2021-06-28 18:20 ` Nick Desaulniers
2021-06-28 19:05 ` [PATCH v2] " Nick Desaulniers
2021-06-28 19:45 ` Nathan Chancellor [this message]
2021-06-28 20:31 ` [PATCH v3] " Nick Desaulniers
2021-06-28 21:19 ` Nathan Chancellor
2021-06-28 22:01 ` Nick Desaulniers
2021-06-28 22:16 ` Nathan Chancellor
2021-07-07 18:18 ` [PATCH v4] " Nick Desaulniers
2021-07-07 18:34 ` Nathan Chancellor
2021-07-07 18:59 ` Fāng-ruì Sòng
2021-08-06 16:20 ` Sami Tolvanen
2021-10-01 19:58 ` [PATCH v5] " Nick Desaulniers
2021-10-01 20:05 ` Sami Tolvanen
2021-10-04 10:46 ` Padmanabha Srinivasaiah
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a970613b-014f-be76-e342-4a51e792b56d@kernel.org \
--to=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com \
--cc=gustavoars@kernel.org \
--cc=jeyu@kernel.org \
--cc=joe@perches.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=like1@oppo.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maskray@google.com \
--cc=mbenes@suse.cz \
--cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=samitolvanen@google.com \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=swboyd@chromium.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).