From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Zeng Guang <guang.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@amd.com>,
Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>,
Jethro Beekman <jethro@fortanix.com>,
Kai Huang <kai.huang@intel.com>,
x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Robert Hu <robert.hu@intel.com>, Gao Chao <chao.gao@intel.com>,
Robert Hoo <robert.hu@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/6] KVM: VMX: Extend BUILD_CONTROLS_SHADOW macro to support 64-bit variation
Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2021 17:51:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a984cf7e-fe3e-98bd-744f-9d0ff3759e01@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YQxnGIT7XLQvPkrz@google.com>
On 06/08/21 00:32, Sean Christopherson wrote:
>> -BUILD_CONTROLS_SHADOW(vm_entry, VM_ENTRY_CONTROLS)
>> -BUILD_CONTROLS_SHADOW(vm_exit, VM_EXIT_CONTROLS)
>> -BUILD_CONTROLS_SHADOW(pin, PIN_BASED_VM_EXEC_CONTROL)
>> -BUILD_CONTROLS_SHADOW(exec, CPU_BASED_VM_EXEC_CONTROL)
>> -BUILD_CONTROLS_SHADOW(secondary_exec, SECONDARY_VM_EXEC_CONTROL)
>> +BUILD_CONTROLS_SHADOW(vm_entry, VM_ENTRY_CONTROLS, 32)
>> +BUILD_CONTROLS_SHADOW(vm_exit, VM_EXIT_CONTROLS, 32)
>> +BUILD_CONTROLS_SHADOW(pin, PIN_BASED_VM_EXEC_CONTROL, 32)
>> +BUILD_CONTROLS_SHADOW(exec, CPU_BASED_VM_EXEC_CONTROL, 32)
>> +BUILD_CONTROLS_SHADOW(secondary_exec, SECONDARY_VM_EXEC_CONTROL, 32)
>> +BUILD_CONTROLS_SHADOW(tertiary_exec, TERTIARY_VM_EXEC_CONTROL, 64)
>
> This fails to compile because all the TERTIARY collateral is in a later patch.
>
> I think I'd also prefer hiding the 32/64 param via more macros, e.g.
>
> #define __BUILD_CONTROLS_SHADOW(lname, uname, bits) \
No, please don't. :) Also because the 64 bit version is used only once.
Agreed on keeping everything here except for TERTIARY_VM_EXEC_CONTROL,
and moving that line to patch 3.
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-06 15:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-05 15:13 [PATCH v3 0/6] IPI virtualization support for VM Zeng Guang
2021-08-05 15:13 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] x86/feat_ctl: Add new VMX feature, Tertiary VM-Execution control Zeng Guang
2021-08-05 15:13 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] KVM: VMX: Extend BUILD_CONTROLS_SHADOW macro to support 64-bit variation Zeng Guang
2021-08-05 22:32 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-08-06 7:01 ` Zeng Guang
2021-08-06 15:05 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-08-06 15:51 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2021-08-06 16:30 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-08-05 15:13 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] KVM: VMX: Detect Tertiary VM-Execution control when setup VMCS config Zeng Guang
2021-08-05 22:35 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-08-05 22:41 ` Jim Mattson
2021-08-06 6:20 ` Zeng Guang
2021-08-05 15:13 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] KVM: VMX: dump_vmcs() reports tertiary_exec_control field as well Zeng Guang
2021-08-05 15:13 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] KVM: x86: Support interrupt dispatch in x2APIC mode with APIC-write VM exit Zeng Guang
2021-08-05 15:13 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] KVM: VMX: enable IPI virtualization Zeng Guang
2021-08-05 17:03 ` [PATCH v3 0/6] IPI virtualization support for VM Jim Mattson
2021-08-06 5:36 ` Zeng Guang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a984cf7e-fe3e-98bd-744f-9d0ff3759e01@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=chao.gao@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=guang.zeng@intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jarkko@kernel.org \
--cc=jethro@fortanix.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kai.huang@intel.com \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kim.phillips@amd.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=robert.hu@intel.com \
--cc=robert.hu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).