linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
To: Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org>, ard.biesheuvel@arm.com
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
	Arvind Sankar <nivedita@alum.mit.edu>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] efi/libstub: Allow EFI_NOT_FOUND on LOAD_FILE2_PROTOCOL calls for initrd
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2020 18:39:21 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aa66cc54-f987-cdcd-05a7-4b63aa8b422d@gmx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201214170122.4569-1-ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org>

On 14.12.20 18:01, Ilias Apalodimas wrote:
> At the moment the EFI stub tries to load an initrd from the
> cmdline provided option only if the LoadFile2 protocol does not exist
> on the initrd device path.
>
> This might prove problematic for EFI installers that need their own
> version of initrd to start the installation process and the firmware

Did you hit a real world case?

> installs the protocol but doesn't have a file to back it up (yet).
> Although some firmware implementations return EFI_NOT_FOUND, we
> currently return EFI_LOAD_ERROR in efi_load_initrd_dev_path() which
> stops the cmdline provided initrd to load.
>
> So let's change the behavior slightly here and explicitly respect the
> firmware in case it returns EFI_NOT_FOUND. This way we can load the
> cmdline provided initrd.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org>
> ---
>  drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/efi-stub-helper.c | 10 +++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/efi-stub-helper.c b/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/efi-stub-helper.c
> index aa8da0a49829..391aae2f0cde 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/efi-stub-helper.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/efi-stub-helper.c
> @@ -560,6 +560,7 @@ static const struct {
>   * * %EFI_SUCCESS if the initrd was loaded successfully, in which
>   *   case @load_addr and @load_size are assigned accordingly
>   * * %EFI_NOT_FOUND if no LoadFile2 protocol exists on the initrd device path
> + *   or if the firmware provides LoadFile2 but can't find a file to load
>   * * %EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER if load_addr == NULL or load_size == NULL
>   * * %EFI_OUT_OF_RESOURCES if memory allocation failed
>   * * %EFI_LOAD_ERROR in all other cases
> @@ -599,7 +600,14 @@ efi_status_t efi_load_initrd_dev_path(unsigned long *load_addr,
>  				(void *)initrd_addr);
>  	if (status != EFI_SUCCESS) {
>  		efi_free(initrd_size, initrd_addr);
> -		return EFI_LOAD_ERROR;
> +		/*
> +		 * Some firmware implementations might install the EFI

In U-Boot the filename is set a compile time. As the path may relate to
a removable medium, it would not make sense to check the existence of
the file when installing the protocol.

> +		 * protocol without checking the file is present and return
> +		 * EFI_NOT_FOUND when trying to load the file.
> +		 * If that's the case, allow the cmdline defined initrd to
> +		 * load.

U-Boot's implementation could also return EFI_NO_MEDIA if
CONFIG_EFI_INITRD_FILESPEC relates to a non-existent partition.

Why should we fall back to the command line in this case?

The whole idea of this protocol is to disallow the specification of an
initrd via the command line.

Best regards

Heinrich

> +		 */
> +		return status == EFI_NOT_FOUND ? status : EFI_LOAD_ERROR;
>  	}
>
>  	*load_addr = initrd_addr;
>


  reply	other threads:[~2020-12-14 17:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-12-14 17:01 [PATCH] efi/libstub: Allow EFI_NOT_FOUND on LOAD_FILE2_PROTOCOL calls for initrd Ilias Apalodimas
2020-12-14 17:39 ` Heinrich Schuchardt [this message]
2020-12-14 17:48   ` Ilias Apalodimas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aa66cc54-f987-cdcd-05a7-4b63aa8b422d@gmx.de \
    --to=xypron.glpk@gmx.de \
    --cc=ard.biesheuvel@arm.com \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=nivedita@alum.mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).