From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB74BC2BA19 for ; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 16:29:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EEB2206A2 for ; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 16:29:34 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=c-s.fr header.i=@c-s.fr header.b="tge7IYZ/" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1416050AbgDOQ3d (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Apr 2020 12:29:33 -0400 Received: from pegase1.c-s.fr ([93.17.236.30]:64108 "EHLO pegase1.c-s.fr" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1416032AbgDOQ3V (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Apr 2020 12:29:21 -0400 Received: from localhost (mailhub1-int [192.168.12.234]) by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id 492SVP12Cjz9txkj; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 18:29:17 +0200 (CEST) Authentication-Results: localhost; dkim=pass reason="1024-bit key; insecure key" header.d=c-s.fr header.i=@c-s.fr header.b=tge7IYZ/; dkim-adsp=pass; dkim-atps=neutral X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at c-s.fr Received: from pegase1.c-s.fr ([192.168.12.234]) by localhost (pegase1.c-s.fr [192.168.12.234]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JZ7646eSBSlU; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 18:29:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: from messagerie.si.c-s.fr (messagerie.si.c-s.fr [192.168.25.192]) by pegase1.c-s.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 492SVN6p5yz9txkh; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 18:29:16 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=c-s.fr; s=mail; t=1586968156; bh=xfHuJITqb5Q/rXxXz7dsTfC5so1bmguxJAbFJb+JvX4=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=tge7IYZ/1Esm1/UqToOr9SwPn9PsAm+oUG6y75D4TS8DcfWQxToCz685tRKCbf0Ti W45RxwYB6V6hQwTuFYqhxBHXTfvkjxqBZzBJCGUF9uzudTlRm/li/b2oRcxiXA4IOW 9VQZvcEY9++n4EVJEri+4erxYp7TzzxlHrvMfnzA= Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by messagerie.si.c-s.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id E45798BB6C; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 18:29:16 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at c-s.fr Received: from messagerie.si.c-s.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (messagerie.si.c-s.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10023) with ESMTP id 3IIfz2WXXSIE; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 18:29:16 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.4.90] (unknown [192.168.4.90]) by messagerie.si.c-s.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 593978BB75; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 18:29:16 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: [PATCH v2,1/5] powerpc: 85xx: make FSL_85XX_CACHE_SRAM configurable To: Wang Wenhu , gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, oss@buserror.net, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Cc: kernel@vivo.com, Michael Ellerman References: <20200415124929.GA3265842@kroah.com> <20200415152442.122873-1-wenhu.wang@vivo.com> <20200415152442.122873-2-wenhu.wang@vivo.com> From: Christophe Leroy Message-ID: Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2020 18:29:08 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200415152442.122873-2-wenhu.wang@vivo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: fr Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Le 15/04/2020 à 17:24, Wang Wenhu a écrit : > Enable FSL_85XX_CACHE_SRAM selection. On e500 platforms, the cache > could be configured and used as a piece of SRAM which is hignly > friendly for some user level application performances. It looks like following patches are fixing errors generated by selecting FSL_85XX_CACHE_SRAM. So this patch should go after the patches which fixes the errors, ie it should be patch 4 in the series. Christophe