From: "Kay Sievers" <kay.sievers@vrfy.org>
To: "Tejun Heo" <htejun@gmail.com>
Cc: "Jon Masters" <jonathan@jonmasters.org>,
"Rusty Russell" <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
"Sam Ravnborg" <sam@ravnborg.org>,
"Linux Kernel" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
notting@redhat.com, "Greg KH" <greg@kroah.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] depmod: sort output according to modules.order, take #2
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 17:13:42 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ac3eb2510811160813j5965a92cj1f4ad6979ecd7090@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <491FAEB8.5010501@gmail.com>
On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 06:25, Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com> wrote:
> Jon Masters wrote:
>> On Thu, 2008-11-13 at 20:36 +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
>>
>>> Jon, this patch hasn't made into module-init-tools
>>
>> I'm redoing it to cope with the binary sorted output files we have now -
>> i.e. we can't just rely upon the order of modules.dep any more, what
>> you're actually trying to do with modules.order is ensure that e.g.
>> modules providing conflicting aliases get handled in "order".
>
> Yes, that's right. Ah... so, now modules.dep is sorted to speed up
> module look up?
It's a match tree, stored in a binary file format, not a specific ordering.
> Is this code already in module-init-tools?
http://git.kernel.org/?p=utils/kernel/module-init-tools/module-init-tools.git;a=summary
Kay
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-11-16 16:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-12-07 12:04 [PATCH] kbuild: implement modules.order, take #2 Tejun Heo
2007-12-07 12:07 ` [PATCH] depmod: sort output according to " Tejun Heo
2007-12-09 9:30 ` Tejun Heo
2008-01-02 11:13 ` Tejun Heo
2008-01-02 23:12 ` Rusty Russell
2008-01-02 23:58 ` Jon Masters
2008-11-13 11:36 ` Tejun Heo
2008-11-13 19:30 ` Jon Masters
2008-11-15 19:20 ` Jon Masters
2008-11-16 5:25 ` Tejun Heo
2008-11-16 16:13 ` Kay Sievers [this message]
2007-12-13 7:12 ` Greg KH
2007-12-09 8:11 ` [PATCH] kbuild: implement " Sam Ravnborg
2007-12-13 7:11 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ac3eb2510811160813j5965a92cj1f4ad6979ecd7090@mail.gmail.com \
--to=kay.sievers@vrfy.org \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=htejun@gmail.com \
--cc=jonathan@jonmasters.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=notting@redhat.com \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).