From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965187AbaH0Uo1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Aug 2014 16:44:27 -0400 Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([198.137.202.10]:50605 "EHLO mail.zytor.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964892AbaH0Uo0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Aug 2014 16:44:26 -0400 User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android In-Reply-To: <20140827185138.GA12487@redhat.com> References: <20140827185138.GA12487@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] x86, fpu: copy_process's FPU paths cleanups From: "H. Peter Anvin" Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 13:43:14 -0700 To: Oleg Nesterov , Al Viro , Andrew Morton , Fenghua Yu , Linus Torvalds , Suresh Siddha CC: Bean Anderson , Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Oleg, this is unacceptable. Last week was Kernel Summit and that was right on the heels of a merge window. We are backlogged like crazy and being rude doesn't help one iota. On August 27, 2014 11:51:38 AM PDT, Oleg Nesterov wrote: >Hello, > >Who can review this? And where should I send FPU changes? > >And it seems that nobody cares about 2 fixes I sent before. >Linus, I understand that you won't take them into v3.17, but >perhaps you can ack/nack them explicitly? It seems that nobody >can do this. > >Oleg. > > arch/x86/include/asm/fpu-internal.h | 2 +- > arch/x86/kernel/process.c | 16 +++++++++------- > arch/x86/kernel/process_32.c | 2 -- > arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c | 1 - > 4 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) -- Sent from my mobile phone. Please pardon brevity and lack of formatting.