From: Can Guo <cang@codeaurora.org>
To: Bean Huo <huobean@gmail.com>
Cc: alim.akhtar@samsung.com, avri.altman@wdc.com,
asutoshd@codeaurora.org, jejb@linux.ibm.com,
martin.petersen@oracle.com, stanley.chu@mediatek.com,
beanhuo@micron.com, bvanassche@acm.org, tomas.winkler@intel.com,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] scsi: ufs: Changes comment in the function ufshcd_wb_probe()
Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2020 11:27:02 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ad0e4e0405887fa2850fe59072dfbf06@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201130181143.5739-4-huobean@gmail.com>
On 2020-12-01 02:11, Bean Huo wrote:
> From: Bean Huo <beanhuo@micron.com>
>
> USFHCD supports WriteBooster "LU dedicated buffer” mode and
> “shared buffer” mode both, so changes the comment in the
> function ufshcd_wb_probe().
>
> Signed-off-by: Bean Huo <beanhuo@micron.com>
Reviewed-by: Can Guo <cang@codeaurora.org>
> ---
> drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 7 +++----
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> index eb7a2534b072..2091775ed3e2 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> @@ -7166,10 +7166,9 @@ static void ufshcd_wb_probe(struct ufs_hba
> *hba, u8 *desc_buf)
> goto wb_disabled;
>
> /*
> - * WB may be supported but not configured while provisioning.
> - * The spec says, in dedicated wb buffer mode,
> - * a max of 1 lun would have wb buffer configured.
> - * Now only shared buffer mode is supported.
> + * WB may be supported but not configured while provisioning. The
> spec
> + * says, in dedicated wb buffer mode, a max of 1 lun would have wb
> + * buffer configured.
> */
> dev_info->b_wb_buffer_type =
> desc_buf[DEVICE_DESC_PARAM_WB_TYPE];
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-12-04 3:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-30 18:11 [PATCH 0/3] Three changes for UFS WriteBooster Bean Huo
2020-11-30 18:11 ` [PATCH 1/3] scsi: ufs: Add "wb_on" sysfs node to control WB on/off Bean Huo
2020-11-30 23:19 ` Asutosh Das (asd)
2020-12-02 16:20 ` Bean Huo
2020-12-02 17:58 ` Asutosh Das (asd)
2020-11-30 18:11 ` [PATCH 2/3] scsi: ufs: Keep device power on only fWriteBoosterBufferFlushDuringHibernate == 1 Bean Huo
[not found] ` <BY5PR04MB6599826730BD3FB0E547E60587F30@BY5PR04MB6599.namprd04.prod.outlook.com>
2020-12-03 7:27 ` Avri Altman
2020-12-03 9:36 ` Bean Huo
2020-12-03 9:40 ` Bean Huo
2020-12-03 10:46 ` Avri Altman
2020-12-03 11:45 ` Bean Huo
2020-12-03 12:15 ` Avri Altman
2020-12-03 12:31 ` Bean Huo
2020-12-04 3:26 ` Can Guo
2020-12-04 8:28 ` Bean Huo
2020-11-30 18:11 ` [PATCH 3/3] scsi: ufs: Changes comment in the function ufshcd_wb_probe() Bean Huo
2020-12-04 3:27 ` Can Guo [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ad0e4e0405887fa2850fe59072dfbf06@codeaurora.org \
--to=cang@codeaurora.org \
--cc=alim.akhtar@samsung.com \
--cc=asutoshd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=avri.altman@wdc.com \
--cc=beanhuo@micron.com \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=huobean@gmail.com \
--cc=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=stanley.chu@mediatek.com \
--cc=tomas.winkler@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).