From: David Lechner <david@lechnology.com>
To: William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@gmail.com>
Cc: jic23@kernel.org, kernel@pengutronix.de,
linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com,
a.fatoum@pengutronix.de, kamel.bouhara@bootlin.com,
gwendal@chromium.org, alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com,
linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, syednwaris@gmail.com,
patrick.havelange@essensium.com, fabrice.gasnier@st.com,
mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com, alexandre.torgue@st.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 5/5] counter: 104-quad-8: Add IRQ support for the ACCES 104-QUAD-8
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2021 19:10:59 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <add6a885-e666-c5b7-612c-c2d1b08111a5@lechnology.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YCXEFMJOoOhyhfBu@shinobu>
On 2/11/21 5:56 PM, William Breathitt Gray wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 30, 2020 at 11:36:45AM -0600, David Lechner wrote:
>> On 12/25/20 6:15 PM, William Breathitt Gray wrote:
>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-counter-104-quad-8 b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-counter-104-quad-8
>>> index eac32180c40d..0ecba24d43aa 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-counter-104-quad-8
>>> +++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-counter-104-quad-8
>>> @@ -1,3 +1,28 @@
>>> +What: /sys/bus/counter/devices/counterX/countY/irq_trigger
>>
>> Do we really need this sysfs attribute? Shouldn't interrupts be configured
>> _only_ by the chrdev interface?
>
> I think this attribute can go away because we can implicitly figure out
> the correct IRQ configuration from the struct counter_watch data when a
> user executes a COUNTER_ADD_WATCH_IOCTL ioctl command.
>
> However, I need some help deciding on an appropriate behavior for
> conflicting counter_watch configurations. Let me give some context
> first.
>
> The 104-QUAD-8 features 8 channels (essentially 8 independent physical
> counters on the device). Each channel can independently issue an event,
> but any particular channel can only be set to a single kind of event
> (COUNTER_EVENT_INDEX, COUNTER_EVENT_OVERFLOW, etc.).
>
> The purpose of the irq_trigger sysfs attribute I introduced in this
> patch is to allow the user to select the event configuration they want
> for a particular channel. We can theoretically figure this out
> implicitly from the struct counter_watch request, so this sysfs
> attribute may not be necessary.
>
> However, how do we handle the case where a user executes two
> COUNTER_ADD_WATCH_IOCTL ioctl commands for the same channel but with
> different event selections? I'm considering three possible behaviors:
>
> * Fail the second ioctl call; event selection of the first struct
> counter_watch takes precedence and thus second is incompatible.
> * Issue a dev_warn() indicating that the second struct counter_watch
> event selection will now be the event configuration for that channel.
> * Don't notify the user, just silently reconfigure for the second struct
> counter_watch event selection.
>
> I'm suspecting the first behavior I listed here (ioctl returning failed)
> is the most appropriate as a user is explicitly made known of this
> particular device's inability to support more than one type of event per
> channel.
>
> What do you think?
>
I agree that it should return an error instead of adding the watch.
I'm pretty sure that is how I implemented the TI eQEP driver already.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-12 1:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-12-26 0:15 [PATCH v7 0/5] Introduce the Counter character device interface William Breathitt Gray
2020-12-26 0:15 ` [PATCH v7 1/5] counter: Internalize sysfs interface code William Breathitt Gray
2020-12-30 14:37 ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-01-06 5:29 ` William Breathitt Gray
2020-12-30 23:24 ` David Lechner
2021-01-06 5:30 ` William Breathitt Gray
2020-12-26 0:15 ` [PATCH v7 2/5] docs: counter: Update to reflect sysfs internalization William Breathitt Gray
2020-12-30 14:41 ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-12-26 0:15 ` [PATCH v7 3/5] counter: Add character device interface William Breathitt Gray
2020-12-30 15:04 ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-02-12 6:32 ` William Breathitt Gray
2020-12-30 21:36 ` David Lechner
2021-01-30 4:59 ` William Breathitt Gray
2021-01-28 9:01 ` Oleksij Rempel
2021-01-30 5:15 ` William Breathitt Gray
2020-12-26 0:15 ` [PATCH v7 4/5] docs: counter: Document " William Breathitt Gray
2020-12-30 14:47 ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-12-30 18:18 ` David Lechner
2020-12-26 0:15 ` [PATCH v7 5/5] counter: 104-quad-8: Add IRQ support for the ACCES 104-QUAD-8 William Breathitt Gray
2020-12-30 15:31 ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-02-12 6:04 ` William Breathitt Gray
2020-12-30 17:36 ` David Lechner
2021-02-11 23:56 ` William Breathitt Gray
2021-02-12 1:10 ` David Lechner [this message]
2020-12-30 23:34 ` [PATCH v7 0/5] Introduce the Counter character device interface David Lechner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=add6a885-e666-c5b7-612c-c2d1b08111a5@lechnology.com \
--to=david@lechnology.com \
--cc=a.fatoum@pengutronix.de \
--cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
--cc=alexandre.torgue@st.com \
--cc=fabrice.gasnier@st.com \
--cc=gwendal@chromium.org \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=kamel.bouhara@bootlin.com \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
--cc=mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com \
--cc=patrick.havelange@essensium.com \
--cc=syednwaris@gmail.com \
--cc=vilhelm.gray@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).