From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] ftrace, x86: make kernel text writable only for conversions
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 13:00:31 -0500 (EST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.0902201259020.13747@gandalf.stny.rr.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090220175535.GN24538@elte.hu>
On Fri, 20 Feb 2009, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:
>
> > > > +/* used by ftrace */
> > > > +void set_kernel_text_rw(void)
> > >
> > > i'd leave out the 'used by ftrace' bit - more uses might
> > > arise. How does kprobes get around readonly pages, it uses
> > > these APIs too, right?
> >
> > kprobes uses text_poke. text_poke uses vmap to create its own
> > page table pointers to the text memory, does the modification
> > and then removes the pointers. This is quite heavy weight and
> > since ftrace needs to modify 10s of thousands of areas,
> > converting all of kernel text page tables is much more
> > efficient.
> >
> > Note, if kprobes did change the original page tables, then it
> > too would have hit the split_large_page bug too.
>
> i think the real reason is that kprobes was written before we
> had this more flexible and more usable CPA code.
I'm not saying that was the reason kprobes did it that way. I was just
answering your question about how kprobes does it today ;-)
Perhaps it may be more efficient to convert kprobes to use the
set_memory_rw/ro API now.
-- Steve
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-20 18:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-20 16:38 [git pull] updates for tip Steven Rostedt
2009-02-20 16:38 ` [PATCH 1/5] ftrace: allow archs to preform pre and post process for code modification Steven Rostedt
2009-02-20 17:25 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-20 17:32 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-02-20 16:38 ` [PATCH 2/5] ftrace, x86: make kernel text writable only for conversions Steven Rostedt
2009-02-20 17:30 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-20 17:52 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-02-20 17:55 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-20 18:00 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2009-02-20 16:38 ` [PATCH 3/5] ftrace: immediately stop code modification if failure is detected Steven Rostedt
2009-02-20 16:38 ` [PATCH 4/5] ftrace: break out modify loop immediately on detection of error Steven Rostedt
2009-02-20 17:33 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-20 17:54 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-02-20 16:38 ` [PATCH 5/5] ftrace, x86: do not depend on system state for kernel text info Steven Rostedt
2009-02-20 17:34 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-20 17:54 ` Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.00.0902201259020.13747@gandalf.stny.rr.com \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=srostedt@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).