From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757479Ab0GNXwb (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Jul 2010 19:52:31 -0400 Received: from smtp-out.google.com ([74.125.121.35]:46469 "EHLO smtp-out.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754396Ab0GNXwa (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Jul 2010 19:52:30 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=beta; d=google.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=date:from:x-x-sender:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id: references:user-agent:mime-version:content-type:x-system-of-record; b=PEKMrdet0UmvL3MSKgbc1P0nav33Snodt2u46p+YatEunHP0bORVIjJylt7ChJJQX FqksLWxATBOOqgGc7VIIw== Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 16:52:24 -0700 (PDT) From: David Rientjes X-X-Sender: rientjes@chino.kir.corp.google.com To: Christoph Lameter , Pekka Enberg cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Nick Piggin Subject: Re: [S+Q2 00/19] SLUB with queueing (V2) beats SLAB netperf TCP_RR In-Reply-To: <20100709190706.938177313@quilx.com> Message-ID: References: <20100709190706.938177313@quilx.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-System-Of-Record: true Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 9 Jul 2010, Christoph Lameter wrote: > The following patchset cleans some pieces up and then equips SLUB with > per cpu queues that work similar to SLABs queues. Pekka, I think patches 4-8 could be applied to your tree now, they're relatively unchanged from what's been posted before. (I didn't ack patch 9 because I think it makes slab_lock() -> slab_unlock() matching more difficult with little win, but I don't feel strongly about it.) I'd also consider patch 7 for 2.6.35-rc6 (and -stable).