From: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [S+Q2 00/19] SLUB with queueing (V2) beats SLAB netperf TCP_RR
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2010 15:17:23 -0500 (CDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1007151515230.21299@router.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1007141518030.17291@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
On Wed, 14 Jul 2010, David Rientjes wrote:
> There are a couple differences between how you're using it compared to how
> I showed the initial regression between slab and slub, however: you're
> using localhost for your netserver which isn't representative of a real
> networking round-robin workload and you're using a smaller system with
> eight cores. We never measured a _significant_ performance problem with
> slub compared to slab with four or eight cores, the problem only emerges
> on larger systems.
Larger systems would more NUMA support than is present in the current
patches.
> When running this patchset on two (client and server running
> netperf-2.4.5) four 2.2GHz quad-core AMD processors with 64GB of memory,
> here's the results:
What is their NUMA topology? I dont have anything beyond two nodes here.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-07-15 20:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-09 19:07 [S+Q2 00/19] SLUB with queueing (V2) beats SLAB netperf TCP_RR Christoph Lameter
2010-07-09 19:07 ` [S+Q2 01/19] Bugfix for semop() not reporting successful operation Christoph Lameter
2010-07-09 19:07 ` [S+Q2 02/19] percpu: make @dyn_size always mean min dyn_size in first chunk init functions Christoph Lameter
2010-07-09 19:07 ` [S+Q2 03/19] percpu: allow limited allocation before slab is online Christoph Lameter
2010-07-09 19:07 ` [S+Q2 04/19] slub: Use a constant for a unspecified node Christoph Lameter
2010-07-09 19:07 ` [S+Q2 05/19] SLUB: Constants need UL Christoph Lameter
2010-07-09 19:07 ` [S+Q2 06/19] slub: Check kasprintf results in kmem_cache_init() Christoph Lameter
2010-07-14 22:16 ` David Rientjes
2010-07-09 19:07 ` [S+Q2 07/19] slub: Allow removal of slab caches during boot Christoph Lameter
2010-07-14 23:48 ` David Rientjes
2010-07-19 0:07 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-07-19 16:39 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-07-31 9:41 ` Pekka Enberg
2010-08-02 15:36 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-08-03 4:32 ` Pekka Enberg
2010-07-09 19:07 ` [S+Q2 08/19] slub: Use kmem_cache flags to detect if slab is in debugging mode Christoph Lameter
2010-07-09 19:07 ` [S+Q2 09/19] slub: discard_slab_unlock Christoph Lameter
2010-07-09 19:07 ` [S+Q2 10/19] slub: remove dynamic dma slab allocation Christoph Lameter
2010-07-09 19:07 ` [S+Q2 11/19] slub: Remove static kmem_cache_cpu array for boot Christoph Lameter
2010-07-09 19:07 ` [S+Q2 12/19] slub: Dynamically size kmalloc cache allocations Christoph Lameter
2010-07-09 19:07 ` [S+Q2 13/19] slub: Extract hooks for memory checkers from hotpaths Christoph Lameter
2010-07-09 19:07 ` [S+Q2 14/19] slub: Move gfpflag masking out of the hotpath Christoph Lameter
2010-07-09 19:07 ` [S+Q2 15/19] SLUB: Add SLAB style per cpu queueing Christoph Lameter
2010-07-09 19:07 ` [S+Q2 16/19] slub: Resize the new cpu queues Christoph Lameter
2010-07-09 19:07 ` [S+Q2 17/19] SLUB: Get rid of useless function count_free() Christoph Lameter
2010-07-09 19:07 ` [S+Q2 18/19] SLUB: Remove MAX_OBJS limitation Christoph Lameter
2010-07-09 19:07 ` [S+Q2 19/19] slub: Drop allocator announcement Christoph Lameter
2010-07-10 19:56 ` [S+Q2 00/19] SLUB with queueing (V2) beats SLAB netperf TCP_RR Heinz Diehl
2010-07-12 15:11 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-07-12 16:39 ` Heinz Diehl
2010-07-12 17:00 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-07-13 13:56 ` Heinz Diehl
2010-07-14 2:01 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-07-14 11:51 ` Tejun Heo
2010-07-14 14:25 ` Heinz Diehl
2010-07-14 20:22 ` David Rientjes
2010-07-14 11:46 ` Tejun Heo
2010-07-14 22:26 ` David Rientjes
2010-07-15 20:17 ` Christoph Lameter [this message]
2010-07-15 20:30 ` David Rientjes
2010-07-14 23:52 ` David Rientjes
2010-07-16 8:23 ` Pekka Enberg
2010-07-16 9:02 ` David Rientjes
2010-07-19 0:16 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.00.1007151515230.21299@router.home \
--to=cl@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=npiggin@suse.de \
--cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).