From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757627Ab0KPU5c (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Nov 2010 15:57:32 -0500 Received: from smtp-out.google.com ([216.239.44.51]:48456 "EHLO smtp-out.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755992Ab0KPU5b (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Nov 2010 15:57:31 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=google.com; s=beta; h=date:from:x-x-sender:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id :references:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; b=j2dXbbfAxQSUDE3vHV7Wj5RL7wAtdIG0YZQ8/y2XXVAnnBBQYlxSSvKjjR3ra2sIf1 +JxCL4Kz3ecy5r75PxJg== Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 12:57:21 -0800 (PST) From: David Rientjes X-X-Sender: rientjes@chino.kir.corp.google.com To: Alan Cox cc: Florian Mickler , Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, Jesper Juhl , KOSAKI Motohiro , Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , LKML , Ying Han , Bodo Eggert <7eggert@web.de>, Mandeep Singh Baines , "Figo.zhang" Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert oom rewrite series In-Reply-To: <20101116145551.49c47df5@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> Message-ID: References: <20101115093410.BEFD.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> <20101114181905.bc5b44f9.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20101115113238.BF06.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> <34565.1289866395@localhost> <20101116110310.1502de2a@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> <20101116140341.42561c84@schatten.dmk.lab> <20101116145551.49c47df5@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-System-Of-Record: true Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 16 Nov 2010, Alan Cox wrote: > Yes - so why is it spewing crap, annoying users and trying to irritate > application authors. It's not 2012 yet. > It's a WARN_ON_ONCE() so it will only spew a single line as a reminder that the application needs to be updated; would you prefer that to be suppressed until a year before removal, for example?