linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
To: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: "Figo.zhang" <figo1802@gmail.com>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2]mm/oom-kill: direct hardware access processes should get bonus
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 12:05:17 -0800 (PST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1011301204010.12979@chino.kir.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101130220107.8328.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com>

On Tue, 30 Nov 2010, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:

> > I needed a small bias for CAP_SYS_ADMIN tasks so I chose 3% since it's the 
> > same proportion used elsewhere in the kernel and works nicely since the 
> > badness score is now a proportion.  
> 
> Why? Is this important than X?
> 

We have always preferred to break ties between applications by not 
preferring the root task over the user task in the oom killer.  If you'd 
like to remove this bonus for CAP_SYS_ADMIN, please propose a patch.  
Thanks!

  reply	other threads:[~2010-11-30 20:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-11-02  1:43 [PATCH]oom-kill: direct hardware access processes should get bonus Figo.zhang
2010-11-02  3:10 ` David Rientjes
2010-11-02 14:24   ` Figo.zhang
2010-11-02 19:34     ` David Rientjes
2010-11-03 23:43 ` [PATCH v2]oom-kill: CAP_SYS_RESOURCE " Figo.zhang
2010-11-03 23:47   ` David Rientjes
     [not found]     ` <AANLkTimjfmLzr_9+Sf4gk0xGkFjffQ1VcCnwmCXA88R8@mail.gmail.com>
2010-11-04  1:38       ` Figo.zhang
2010-11-04  1:50         ` David Rientjes
2010-11-04  2:12           ` Figo.zhang
2010-11-04  2:54             ` David Rientjes
2010-11-04  4:42               ` Figo.zhang
2010-11-04  5:08                 ` David Rientjes
2010-11-09 11:01           ` [PATCH " KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-11-09 12:24             ` Alan Cox
2010-11-09 21:06               ` David Rientjes
2010-11-09 21:25                 ` David Rientjes
2010-11-10 14:38                 ` Figo.zhang
2010-11-10 20:50                   ` David Rientjes
2010-11-09 10:41 ` [PATCH]oom-kill: direct hardware access processes " KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-11-09 12:24 ` [PATCH v2]mm/oom-kill: " Figo.zhang
2010-11-09 21:16   ` David Rientjes
2010-11-10 14:48     ` Figo.zhang
2010-11-14  5:07     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-11-14 21:29       ` David Rientjes
2010-11-15  1:24         ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-11-15 10:03           ` David Rientjes
2010-11-23  7:16             ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-11-28  1:36               ` David Rientjes
2010-11-30 13:00                 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-11-30 20:05                   ` David Rientjes [this message]
2010-11-10 15:14   ` [PATCH v3]mm/oom-kill: " Figo.zhang
2010-11-10 15:24     ` Figo.zhang
2010-11-10 21:00       ` David Rientjes
2010-11-14  5:21       ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-11-14 21:33         ` David Rientjes
2010-11-15  3:26           ` [PATCH] Revert oom rewrite series Figo.zhang
2010-11-15 10:14             ` David Rientjes
2010-11-15 10:57               ` Alan Cox
2010-11-15 20:54                 ` David Rientjes
2010-11-23  7:16                 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-01-04  7:51       ` [PATCH v3]mm/oom-kill: direct hardware access processes should get bonus Figo.zhang
2011-01-04  8:28         ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-01-04  8:56           ` Figo.zhang
2011-01-06  0:55             ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-01-05  3:32         ` David Rientjes

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.00.1011301204010.12979@chino.kir.corp.google.com \
    --to=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=figo1802@gmail.com \
    --cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).