From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756758Ab1EXN7s (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 May 2011 09:59:48 -0400 Received: from aspirin.dii.utk.edu ([160.36.0.81]:59372 "EHLO aspirin.dii.utk.edu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756327Ab1EXN7r (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 May 2011 09:59:47 -0400 Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 09:59:25 -0400 (EDT) From: Vince Weaver To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org cc: Peter Zijlstra , fbuihuu@gmail.com, mingo@elte.hu, paulus@samba.org, acme@redhat.com Subject: perf: regression -- missing /sys/devices/system/cpu/perf_events Message-ID: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org I know this is a bit late, but for some reason our users sit on these things and then they aren't willing to take it up with linux-kernel themselves > > > commit 15ac9a395a753cb28c674e7ea80386ffdff21785 > > > Author: Peter Zijlstra > > > Date: Mon Sep 6 15:51:45 2010 +0200 > > > > > > perf: Remove the sysfs bits removed the /sys/devices/system/cpu/perf_events I thought things in /sys were stable ABI? Apparently it's common for people to have scripts to check if perf_events is available in a kernel by checking the existence of /sys/devices/system/cpu/perf_events, even if they didn't use the files within. Now that 2.6.38 kernels are starting to hit the distros we're getting complaints that it's missing. Vince