From: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
To: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rientjes@google.com
Subject: Re: [slub p4 1/7] slub: free slabs without holding locks (V2)
Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2011 10:58:50 -0500 (CDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1108201056070.5267@router.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1108201331400.3008@localhost6.localdomain6>
On Sat, 20 Aug 2011, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> > static void free_partial(struct kmem_cache *s, struct kmem_cache_node *n)
> > {
>
> Is it possible to somehow verify that we're the last thread using the cache
> when SLUB debugging is enabled? It'd be useful for tracking down callers that
> violate this assumption.
Hmmm... We do not track "threads" using slabs. I do not really know what
the "thread" entity that would access a slab is? A subsystem? A kernel
thread? A user thread? All these can access any slab at any time.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-20 15:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-09 21:12 [slub p4 0/7] slub: per cpu partial lists V4 Christoph Lameter
2011-08-09 21:12 ` [slub p4 1/7] slub: free slabs without holding locks (V2) Christoph Lameter
2011-08-20 10:32 ` Pekka Enberg
2011-08-20 15:58 ` Christoph Lameter [this message]
2011-08-09 21:12 ` [slub p4 2/7] slub: Remove useless statements in __slab_alloc Christoph Lameter
2011-08-20 10:44 ` Pekka Enberg
2011-08-20 16:01 ` Christoph Lameter
2011-08-09 21:12 ` [slub p4 3/7] slub: Prepare inuse field in new_slab() Christoph Lameter
2011-08-09 21:12 ` [slub p4 4/7] slub: pass kmem_cache_cpu pointer to get_partial() Christoph Lameter
2011-08-09 21:12 ` [slub p4 5/7] slub: return object pointer from get_partial() / new_slab() Christoph Lameter
2011-08-09 21:12 ` [slub p4 6/7] slub: per cpu cache for partial pages Christoph Lameter
2011-08-20 10:40 ` Pekka Enberg
2011-08-20 16:00 ` Christoph Lameter
[not found] ` <CAF1ivSaH9fh6_QvuBkLc5t=zC4mPEAD5ZzsxOuPruDwG9MiZzw@mail.gmail.com>
2011-08-24 7:26 ` Lin Ming
2011-08-24 13:57 ` Christoph Lameter
2011-08-09 21:12 ` [slub p4 7/7] slub: update slabinfo tools to report per cpu partial list statistics Christoph Lameter
2011-08-13 18:28 ` [slub p4 0/7] slub: per cpu partial lists V4 David Rientjes
2011-08-15 8:44 ` Pekka Enberg
2011-08-15 14:29 ` Christoph Lameter
2011-08-20 10:48 ` Pekka Enberg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.00.1108201056070.5267@router.home \
--to=cl@linux.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).