From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S934675Ab3DHLFX (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Mon, 8 Apr 2013 07:05:23 -0400
Received: from smtp.citrix.com ([66.165.176.89]:41020 "EHLO SMTP.CITRIX.COM"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1757022Ab3DHLFV (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 8 Apr 2013 07:05:21 -0400
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.87,429,1363132800"; 
   d="scan'208";a="18053266"
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2013 12:05:17 +0100
From: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
X-X-Sender: sstabellini@kaball.uk.xensource.com
To: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
CC: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        "will.deacon@arm.com" <will.deacon@arm.com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
        Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>,
        "rob.herring@calxeda.com" <rob.herring@calxeda.com>,
        Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4 v6] arm: introduce psci_smp_ops and use them on Xen
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1304031239550.5078@kaball.uk.xensource.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1304081102500.5353@kaball.uk.xensource.com>
References: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1304031239550.5078@kaball.uk.xensource.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Arnd, Olof,
do you have any thoughts on this series?
Would you be happy to carry it in the arm-soc tree?

The last patch, "xen/arm: introduce xen_early_init, use PSCI on xen" has
a (small) dependency on this series:

http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=136430893610688&w=2

would you be OK with taking that one too, or should that go through the
Xen tree?

Cheers,

Stefano

On Fri, 5 Apr 2013, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> Hi all,
> this is the sixth version of the patch series to move virt_smp_ops out of
> mach-virt and make it a generic set of reusable PSCI based smp_ops.
> psci_smp_ops are preferred over the platform smp_ops.
> I added a patch to introduce smp_init to this series.
> In the last patch I am using smp_init to switch to psci_smp_ops if Xen
> is detected on the platform.
> 
> 
> Jon Medhurst (1):
>       ARM: Enable selection of SMP operations at boot time
> 
> Stefano Stabellini (3):
>       arm: introduce psci_smp_ops
>       arm: prefer psci_smp_ops over mdesc->smp
>       xen/arm: introduce xen_early_init, use PSCI on xen
> 
>  arch/arm/Kconfig                      |    1 +
>  arch/arm/include/asm/mach/arch.h      |    3 +
>  arch/arm/include/asm/psci.h           |   29 ++++++++++++++
>  arch/arm/include/asm/xen/hypervisor.h |    6 +++
>  arch/arm/kernel/Makefile              |    5 ++-
>  arch/arm/kernel/psci.c                |    7 +--
>  arch/arm/kernel/psci_smp.c            |   67 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  arch/arm/kernel/setup.c               |   12 +++++-
>  arch/arm/mach-virt/Makefile           |    1 -
>  arch/arm/mach-virt/platsmp.c          |   58 ----------------------------
>  arch/arm/mach-virt/virt.c             |    3 -
>  arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c              |   36 ++++++++++++++----
>  12 files changed, 152 insertions(+), 76 deletions(-)
> 
>     
> git://xenbits.xen.org/people/sstabellini/linux-pvhvm.git 3.9-rc3-smp-6
> 
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Stefano
>