linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>,
	Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>,
	Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>,
	kadlec@blackhole.kfki.hu, "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, coreteam@netfilter.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>,
	Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Subject: Re: netfilter: active obj WARN when cleaning up
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2013 14:29:41 +0100 (CET)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1311271409280.30673@ionos.tec.linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131127113939.GL16735@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>

On Wed, 27 Nov 2013, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 11:45:17AM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Wed, 27 Nov 2013, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> > 
> > > On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 02:11:57PM -0500, Sasha Levin wrote:
> > > > Ping? I still see this warning.
> > > 
> > > Did your test include patch 0c3c6c00c6?
> > 
> > And how is that patch supposed to help?
> >  
> > > > >[  418.312449] WARNING: CPU: 6 PID: 4178 at lib/debugobjects.c:260 debug_print_object+0x8d/0xb0()
> > > > >[  418.313243] ODEBUG: free active (active state 0) object type: timer_list hint:
> > > > >delayed_work_timer_fn+0x0/0x20
> > 
> > > > >[  418.321101]  [<ffffffff812874d7>] kmem_cache_free+0x197/0x340
> > > > >[  418.321101]  [<ffffffff81249e76>] kmem_cache_destroy+0x86/0xe0
> > > > >[  418.321101]  [<ffffffff83d5d681>] nf_conntrack_cleanup_net_list+0x131/0x170
> > 
> > The debug code detects an active timer, which itself is part of a
> > delayed work struct. The call comes from kmem_cache_destroy().
> > 
> >          kmem_cache_free(kmem_cache, s);
> > 
> > So debug object says: s contains an active timer. s is the kmem_cache
> > which is destroyed from nf_conntrack_cleanup_net_list.
> > 
> > Now struct kmem_cache has in case of SLUB:
> > 
> >     struct kobject kobj;    /* For sysfs */
> > 
> > and struct kobject has:
> > 
> > #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_KOBJECT_RELEASE
> >     struct delayed_work     release;
> > #endif
> > 
> > So this is the thing you want to look at:
> > 
> > commit c817a67ec (kobject: delayed kobject release: help find buggy
> > drivers) added that delayed work thing.
> > 
> > I fear that does not work for kobjects which are embedded into
> > something else.
> 
> No, kobjects embedded into something else have their lifetime determined
> by the embedded kobject.  That's rule #1 of kobjects - or rather reference
> counted objects.
> 
> The point at which the kobject gets destructed is when the release function
> is called.  If it is destructed before that time, that's a violation of
> the reference counted nature of kobjects, and that's what the delay on
> releasing is designed to catch.
> 
> It's designed to catch code which does this exact path:
> 
> 	put(obj)
> 	free(obj)
> 
> rather than code which does it the right way:
> 
> 	put(obj)
> 		-> refcount becomes 0
> 			-> release function gets called
> 				->free(obj)
> 
> The former is unsafe because obj may have other references.

Though the kobject is the only thing which has a delayed work embedded
inside struct kmem_cache. And the debug object splat points at the
kmem_cache_free() of the struct kmem_cache itself. That's why I
assumed the wreckage around that place. And indeed:

kmem_cache_destroy(s)
    __kmem_cache_shutdown(s)
      sysfs_slab_remove(s)
        ....
	kobject_put(&s->kobj)
           kref_put(&kobj->kref, kobject_release);
	     kobject_release(kref)
    	       #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_KOBJECT_RELEASE
	         schedule_delayed_work(&kobj->release)
	       #else
	        kobject_cleanup(kobj)
	       #endif

So in the CONFIG_DEBUG_KOBJECT_RELEASE=y case, schedule_delayed_work()
_IS_ called which arms the timer. debugobjects catches the attempt to
free struct kmem_cache which contains the armed timer.

So much for rule #1

Thanks,

	tglx


  reply	other threads:[~2013-11-27 13:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-09-07 13:10 netfilter: active obj WARN when cleaning up Sasha Levin
2013-11-26 19:11 ` Sasha Levin
2013-11-26 23:07   ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2013-11-26 23:13     ` Sasha Levin
2013-11-27 10:45     ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-11-27 11:39       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-11-27 13:29         ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2013-11-27 13:32           ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-11-27 13:40             ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-11-27 13:44               ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-11-27 23:34                 ` Greg KH
2013-12-02 16:33                   ` Christoph Lameter
2013-12-02 16:40                     ` Greg KH
2013-12-02 17:18                       ` Christoph Lameter
2013-12-02 17:26                         ` Greg KH
2013-12-02 19:00                           ` Christoph Lameter
2013-12-02 19:08                             ` Greg KH
2013-12-02 19:41                               ` Christoph Lameter
2013-12-02 21:22                                 ` Greg KH
2013-12-02 21:55                                   ` Christoph Lameter
2013-12-02 22:22                                     ` Greg KH
2013-12-03 15:22                                       ` Christoph Lameter
2013-12-17 19:53                                         ` Sasha Levin
2013-12-17 20:37                                           ` Christoph Lameter
2013-12-17 22:09                                             ` Sasha Levin
2013-12-17 22:01                                           ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-12-19 12:12                                           ` Bart Van Assche
2013-12-19 14:20                                             ` Bart Van Assche
2013-11-27 13:41             ` Thomas Gleixner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.02.1311271409280.30673@ionos.tec.linutronix.de \
    --to=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=coreteam@netfilter.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=kaber@trash.net \
    --cc=kadlec@blackhole.kfki.hu \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
    --cc=sasha.levin@oracle.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).