From: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
To: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@parallels.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, mhocko@suse.cz, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] memcg: fix mutex not unlocked on memcg_create_kmem_cache fail path
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 13:09:52 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1401301301000.15271@chino.kir.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1391097693-31401-1-git-send-email-vdavydov@parallels.com>
On Thu, 30 Jan 2014, Vladimir Davydov wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@parallels.com>
Some changelog would be helpful since this fixes an issue already in
Linus's tree.
Commit 842e2873697e ("memcg: get rid of kmem_cache_dup()") introduced a
mutex for memcg_create_kmem_cache() to protect the tmp_name buffer that
holds the memcg name. It failed to unlock the mutex if this buffer could
not be allocated.
This patch fixes the issue by appropriately unlocking the mutex if the
allocation fails.
Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
That said, this tmp_name stuff seems totally unnecessary.
kmem_cache_create_memcg() already does the kstrdup() so why not just pass
in a pointer to already allocated memory for s->name rather than having
this mutex or global buffer at all?
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-30 21:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-30 16:01 [PATCH] memcg: fix mutex not unlocked on memcg_create_kmem_cache fail path Vladimir Davydov
2014-01-30 21:01 ` Andrew Morton
2014-01-30 21:14 ` David Rientjes
2014-01-30 21:29 ` Andrew Morton
2014-01-30 21:38 ` David Rientjes
2014-01-30 21:50 ` Andrew Morton
2014-01-30 22:04 ` David Rientjes
2014-01-30 22:09 ` Andrew Morton
2014-01-30 22:13 ` David Rientjes
2014-01-30 22:15 ` Andrew Morton
2014-01-30 22:39 ` David Rientjes
2014-01-31 6:53 ` Vladimir Davydov
2014-01-31 10:42 ` David Rientjes
2014-01-31 11:29 ` Vladimir Davydov
2014-01-30 21:36 ` David Rientjes
2014-01-30 21:09 ` David Rientjes [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.02.1401301301000.15271@chino.kir.corp.google.com \
--to=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
--cc=vdavydov@parallels.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).