From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Darren Hart <darren@dvhart.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@hp.com>, Kees Cook <kees@outflux.net>,
wad@chromium.org
Subject: Re: [patch 1/5] futex: Make unlock_pi more robust
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 00:28:00 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1406170025510.5170@nanos> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1406170002050.5170@nanos>
On Tue, 17 Jun 2014, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Jun 2014, Darren Hart wrote:
> > On Wed, 2014-06-11 at 20:45 +0000, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > In wake_futex_pi we verify ownership by matching pi_state->owner ==
> > current, but here the only test is the TID value, which is set by
> > userspace - which we don't trust...
> >
> > I'm trying to determine if it matters in this case... if there are no
> > waiters, is the pi_state still around? If so, it does indeed matter, and
> > we should be verifying.
>
> Erm. The whole point of this patch is to do:
>
> - Find existing state first and handle it.
>
> - If no state exists and TID == current, take it
>
> - Otherwise create state
Duh, that was the lock path. But here the point is:
- Find existing state first and handle it.
- If no state exists and TID == current, release it
The retry is obvious, right?
Thanks,
tglx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-16 22:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-11 20:45 [patch 0/5] futex: More robustness tweaks Thomas Gleixner
2014-06-11 20:45 ` [patch 1/5] futex: Make unlock_pi more robust Thomas Gleixner
2014-06-16 16:18 ` Darren Hart
2014-06-16 22:15 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-06-16 22:28 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2014-06-16 22:49 ` Darren Hart
2014-06-16 22:39 ` Darren Hart
2014-06-21 20:33 ` [tip:locking/core] " tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner
2014-06-11 20:45 ` [patch 3/5] futex: Split out the waiter check from lookup_pi_state() Thomas Gleixner
2014-06-16 18:12 ` Darren Hart
2014-06-21 20:33 ` [tip:locking/core] " tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner
2014-06-11 20:45 ` [patch 2/5] futex: Use futex_top_waiter() in lookup_pi_state() Thomas Gleixner
2014-06-16 16:51 ` Darren Hart
2014-06-21 20:33 ` [tip:locking/core] " tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner
2014-06-11 20:45 ` [patch 4/5] futex: Split out the first waiter attachment from lookup_pi_state() Thomas Gleixner
2014-06-16 18:19 ` Darren Hart
2014-06-21 20:33 ` [tip:locking/core] " tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner
2014-06-11 20:45 ` [patch 5/5] futex: Simplify futex_lock_pi_atomic() and make it more robust Thomas Gleixner
2014-06-13 5:46 ` Darren Hart
2014-06-13 8:34 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-06-13 9:36 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-06-13 9:44 ` [patch V2 " Thomas Gleixner
2014-06-13 20:51 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2014-06-16 20:36 ` Darren Hart
2014-06-17 7:20 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-06-21 20:34 ` [tip:locking/core] " tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.10.1406170025510.5170@nanos \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=darren@dvhart.com \
--cc=davidlohr@hp.com \
--cc=kees@outflux.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=wad@chromium.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).