From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S933477AbbDITqP (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Thu, 9 Apr 2015 15:46:15 -0400
Received: from mail-ig0-f176.google.com ([209.85.213.176]:33874 "EHLO
	mail-ig0-f176.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S933253AbbDITqL (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 9 Apr 2015 15:46:11 -0400
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2015 12:46:09 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
X-X-Sender: rientjes@chino.kir.corp.google.com
To: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
        Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org>,
        Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>,
        Shuah Khan <shuahkh@osg.samsung.com>,
        Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>, Joern Engel <joern@logfs.org>,
        Jianguo Wu <wujianguo@huawei.com>, Eric B Munson <emunson@akamai.com>,
        linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-api@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch -mm] mm, doc: cleanup and clarify munmap behavior for
 hugetlb memory fix
In-Reply-To: <20150404113456.55468dc3@lwn.net>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1504091244501.11370@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
References: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1503261621570.20009@chino.kir.corp.google.com> <alpine.LSU.2.11.1503291801400.1052@eggly.anvils> <alpine.DEB.2.10.1504021536210.15536@chino.kir.corp.google.com> <alpine.DEB.2.10.1504021547330.15536@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
 <20150404113456.55468dc3@lwn.net>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.10 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Sat, 4 Apr 2015, Jonathan Corbet wrote:

> On Thu, 2 Apr 2015 15:50:15 -0700 (PDT)
> David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> wrote:
> 
> > Don't only specify munmap(2) behavior with respect the hugetlb memory, all 
> > other syscalls get naturally aligned to the native page size of the 
> > processor.  Rather, pick out munmap(2) as a specific example.
> 
> So I was going to apply this to the docs tree, but it doesn't even come
> close.  What tree was this patch generated against?
> 

Sorry, it's not intended to go through the docs tree, it's a patch to fix 
mm-doc-cleanup-and-clarify-munmap-behavior-for-hugetlb-memory.patch in 
-mm.  It's been merged into that tree, but I would still appreciate your 
ack!