From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932832AbbFSUqA (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Jun 2015 16:46:00 -0400 Received: from mga14.intel.com ([192.55.52.115]:31115 "EHLO mga14.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932782AbbFSUpE (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Jun 2015 16:45:04 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.13,645,1427785200"; d="scan'208";a="749831058" Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2015 13:42:02 -0700 (PDT) From: Vikas Shivappa X-X-Sender: vikas@vshiva-Udesk To: Thomas Gleixner cc: Vikas Shivappa , Vikas Shivappa , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, mingo@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, matt.fleming@intel.com, will.auld@intel.com, linux-rdt@eclists.intel.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/10] x86/intel_rdt: Hot cpu support for Cache Allocation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <1434133037-25189-1-git-send-email-vikas.shivappa@linux.intel.com> <1434133037-25189-10-git-send-email-vikas.shivappa@linux.intel.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.10 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 16 Jun 2015, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Tue, 16 Jun 2015, Vikas Shivappa wrote: >> On Tue, 16 Jun 2015, Thomas Gleixner wrote: >> >>> On Fri, 12 Jun 2015, Vikas Shivappa wrote: >>>> +static inline void intel_rdt_cpu_start(int cpu) >>>> +{ >>>> + struct intel_pqr_state *state = &per_cpu(pqr_state, cpu); >>>> + >>>> + state->closid = 0; >>>> + mutex_lock(&rdt_group_mutex); >>> >>> This is called from CPU_STARTING, which runs on the starting cpu with >>> interrupts disabled. Clearly never tested with any of the mandatory >>> debug configs enabled. >> >> But this can race with cbm_update_all calling on_each_cpu_mask ? or in other >> words the lock helps on_each_cpu_mask not race with hot cpu code updating the >> rdt_cpumask since the on_each_cpu_mask is also called with the lock always. >> >> Its tested on the 0 day build which should include the debug config. Will add >> a tested tag. > > And that tag gives you special permission to take a mutex in irq > disabled context on a cpu which cannot schedule, right? Will fix. Doing case CPU_ONLINE: intel_rdt_cpu_start(cpu); instead of CPU_UP_PREPARE: intel_rdt_cpu_start(cpu); should work ? CPU_ONLINE is just enough for me which doesnot have interrupts disabled and i can then sync using the lock. Thanks, Vikas > > Thanks, > > tglx > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/