linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>
To: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Andy Whitcroft <apw@canonical.com>,
	Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>,
	kernel-janitors <kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH V2] checkpatch: Check output format style of __func__ uses
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 09:29:43 +0100 (CET)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1603140929150.2688@hadrien> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1457940942.11972.69.camel@perches.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: TEXT/PLAIN, Size: 1721 bytes --]



On Mon, 14 Mar 2016, Joe Perches wrote:

> On Mon, 2016-03-14 at 06:19 +0100, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > On Sun, 13 Mar 2016, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > Loggng messages that emit function names have many different forms.
> > > Perhaps it'd be better for logging consistency and grep ease to
> > > exclusively use "%s:"
> > > 
> > > As well, function tracing logging uses are generally unnecessary given
> > > the kernel's function tracing (ftrace) capability.
> > > 
> > > Right now, grep shows these mixtures of forms:
> > > 
> > > 13704 "%s:"
> > > 3839  "%s "
> > > 2787  "%s()"
> > > 
> > > Some of these are macros definitions of various styles.
> > > 
> > > Unfortunately, given the complexity of these macro definition styles,
> > > checkpatch isn't an ideal tool to find these macros.
> > > 
> > > Maybe a coccinelle script might be better suited to find and fix all
> > > the various types of uses.
> > > 
> > > Add a --fix option for these logging messages with __func__.
> >
> > I'm not good enough at perl to really understand this.  Coudl you give an 
> > example of what it does, and of what it does not do?
>
> For instance, this could do simple conversions like:
>
> $ diff --git a/arch/arm/common/mcpm_entry.c b/arch/arm/common/mcpm_entry.c
> @@ -416 +416 @@ int __init mcpm_loopback(void (*cache_disable)(void))
> -               pr_err("%s returned %d\n", __func__, ret);
> +               pr_err("%s: returned %d\n", __func__, ret);
>
> But it couldn't find/convert a string concatenation:
>
> #define pch_dbg(adap, fmt, arg...)  \
>         dev_dbg(adap->pch_adapter.dev.parent, "%s :" fmt, __func__, ##arg)

OK, are there any thoughts about what to do when __func__ is not in the
first position?

julia

  reply	other threads:[~2016-03-14  8:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-03-13 19:19 [RFC PATCH] checkpatch: check formatting of __func__ output uses Joe Perches
2016-03-14  0:42 ` [RFC PATCH V2] checkpatch: Check output format style of __func__ uses Joe Perches
2016-03-14  5:19   ` Julia Lawall
2016-03-14  7:35     ` Joe Perches
2016-03-14  8:29       ` Julia Lawall [this message]
2016-03-14 14:07         ` Joe Perches

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.10.1603140929150.2688@hadrien \
    --to=julia.lawall@lip6.fr \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=apw@canonical.com \
    --cc=error27@gmail.com \
    --cc=joe@perches.com \
    --cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).