linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/9 v2] ftrace/x86: Clean up of mcount.S code
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 23:03:57 +0100 (CET)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1411262249260.3961@nanos> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141125115003.856641273@goodmis.org>

On Tue, 25 Nov 2014, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> I ran these through my test suite and they passed. Are these changes
> fine for you? If so, I'll include them in my 3.19 queue.
> 
> I still think the "band-aid patch" should go into 3.18 now, as it does
> fix a real bug, and is small and less likely to cause any regressions that
> this patch series might do. Which also makes it a candidate for stable.

Bah. It confused the hell out of me to figure out what that band aid
patch would be in the series.

So you are referring to the patch which I acked already, and which
caused Linus to stick his nose into that code.

Right, we really should (ignoring the ugliness) push that back into
stable. Having debug infrastructure which provides half baken
information is a real pain. I wasted days in the past just to figure
out that the tracer was giving me incomplete information or refusing
to stop when I wanted it to. I rather prefer a tool to be 'slow' than
disfunctional.

Thanks,

	tglx

  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-11-26 22:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-11-25 11:50 [RFC][PATCH 0/9 v2] ftrace/x86: Clean up of mcount.S code Steven Rostedt
2014-11-25 11:50 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/9 v2] ftrace/x86: Have static tracing also use ftrace_caller_setup Steven Rostedt
2014-11-25 11:50 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/9 v2] ftrace/x86: Move MCOUNT_SAVE_FRAME out of header file Steven Rostedt
2014-11-25 11:50 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/9 v2] ftrace/x86: Rename MCOUNT_SAVE_FRAME and add more detailed comments Steven Rostedt
2014-11-25 11:50 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/9 v2] ftrace/x86: Have save_mcount_regs store RIP in %rdi for first parameter Steven Rostedt
2014-11-25 11:50 ` [RFC][PATCH 5/9 v2] ftrace/x86: Simplify save_mcount_regs on getting RIP Steven Rostedt
2014-11-25 11:50 ` [RFC][PATCH 6/9 v2] ftrace/x86: Add macro MCOUNT_REG_SIZE for amount of stack used to save mcount regs Steven Rostedt
2014-11-25 11:50 ` [RFC][PATCH 7/9 v2] ftrace/x86: Have save_mcount_regs macro also save stack frames if needed Steven Rostedt
2014-11-25 11:50 ` [RFC][PATCH 8/9 v2] ftrace/x86: Get rid of ftrace_caller_setup Steven Rostedt
2014-11-25 11:50 ` [RFC][PATCH 9/9 v2] ftrace/fgraph/x86: Have prepare_ftrace_return() take ip as first parameter Steven Rostedt
2014-11-25 17:36 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/9 v2] ftrace/x86: Clean up of mcount.S code Linus Torvalds
2014-11-26 22:03 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2014-11-26 22:05 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-11-26 23:13   ` Steven Rostedt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.11.1411262249260.3961@nanos \
    --to=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).