From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1751595AbbJKTvE (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Sun, 11 Oct 2015 15:51:04 -0400
Received: from www.linutronix.de ([62.245.132.108]:42043 "EHLO
	Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1751073AbbJKTvB (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Sun, 11 Oct 2015 15:51:01 -0400
Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2015 21:50:12 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
cc: H Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, x86 <x86@kernel.org>,
        Vikas Shivappa <vikas.shivappa@linux.intel.com>,
        Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V15 00/11] x86: Intel Cache Allocation Technology
 Support
In-Reply-To: <1443766185-61618-1-git-send-email-fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1510112145100.6097@nanos>
References: <1443766185-61618-1-git-send-email-fenghua.yu@intel.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (DEB 23 2013-08-11)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Linutronix-Spam-Score: -1.0
X-Linutronix-Spam-Level: -
X-Linutronix-Spam-Status: No , -1.0 points, 5.0 required,  ALL_TRUSTED=-1,SHORTCIRCUIT=-0.0001
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Fenghua,

On Thu, 1 Oct 2015, Fenghua Yu wrote:

+Cc: Marcelo

> This series has some preparatory patches and Intel cache allocation
> support.

<snip>

> Changes in v15:
>  - Add a global IPI to update the closid on CPUs for current tasks.
>  - Other minor changes where I remove the updating of clos_cbm_table to be
>  set to all 1s during init.
>  - Fix a few compilation warnings.
>  - Port the patches to 4.3-rc.
 
What's the state of the interface discussion? I have not yet seen any
agreement on that, unless I missed the important mail.

Aside of that, the patches miss a proper

From: Vikas ...

in the patch body at least for those which are untouched by you.

Thanks,

	tglx