From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752702AbcCBH4T (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Mar 2016 02:56:19 -0500 Received: from www.linutronix.de ([62.245.132.108]:49663 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751144AbcCBH4S (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Mar 2016 02:56:18 -0500 Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2016 08:54:39 +0100 (CET) From: Thomas Gleixner To: Stephen Rothwell cc: Greg KH , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , Peter Zijlstra , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "J. German Rivera" , Qais Yousef Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the tip tree In-Reply-To: <20160302143506.5f75d279@canb.auug.org.au> Message-ID: References: <20160302143506.5f75d279@canb.auug.org.au> User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (DEB 23 2013-08-11) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Linutronix-Spam-Score: -1.0 X-Linutronix-Spam-Level: - X-Linutronix-Spam-Status: No , -1.0 points, 5.0 required, ALL_TRUSTED=-1,SHORTCIRCUIT=-0.0001 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2 Mar 2016, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Greg, > > Today's linux-next merge of the staging tree got a conflict in: > > include/linux/irqdomain.h > > between commit: > > 29d5c8db26ad ("genirq: Add DOMAIN_BUS_IPI") > > from the tip tree and commit: > > 9b1b282ccd81 ("irqdomain: Added domain bus token DOMAIN_BUS_FSL_MC_MSI") > > from the staging tree. > > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action > is required). > > -- > Cheers, > Stephen Rothwell > > diff --cc include/linux/irqdomain.h > index ed48594e96d2,0934d06c8b00..000000000000 > --- a/include/linux/irqdomain.h > +++ b/include/linux/irqdomain.h > @@@ -74,7 -74,7 +74,8 @@@ enum irq_domain_bus_token > DOMAIN_BUS_PCI_MSI, > DOMAIN_BUS_PLATFORM_MSI, > DOMAIN_BUS_NEXUS, > + DOMAIN_BUS_IPI, > + DOMAIN_BUS_FSL_MC_MSI, Errm. What's that? Did that DOMAIN_BUS_FSL_MC_MSI thingy get any review of the irq[domain] maintainers? Thanks, tglx