From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757452AbcFAHFR (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Jun 2016 03:05:17 -0400 Received: from www.linutronix.de ([62.245.132.108]:35698 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752209AbcFAHFP (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Jun 2016 03:05:15 -0400 Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2016 09:03:23 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Gleixner To: Neil Armstrong cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, daniel.lezcano@linaro.org, Ma Haijun Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] clocksource: Add Oxford Semiconductor RPS Dual Timer In-Reply-To: <1464688198-9655-2-git-send-email-narmstrong@baylibre.com> Message-ID: References: <1464688198-9655-1-git-send-email-narmstrong@baylibre.com> <1464688198-9655-2-git-send-email-narmstrong@baylibre.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (DEB 23 2013-08-11) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Linutronix-Spam-Score: -1.0 X-Linutronix-Spam-Level: - X-Linutronix-Spam-Status: No , -1.0 points, 5.0 required, ALL_TRUSTED=-1,SHORTCIRCUIT=-0.0001 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 31 May 2016, Neil Armstrong wrote: > +static int oxnas_rps_timer_shutdown(struct clock_event_device *evt) > +{ > + struct oxnas_rps_timer *rps = > + container_of(evt, struct oxnas_rps_timer, clkevent); > + > + if (!clockevent_state_periodic(evt)) > + return 0; So if the timer is in oneshot mode, then you just leave it enabled. What's the rationale of this? > + > + oxnas_rps_timer_config(rps, 0, 0); Thanks, tglx